Description
Aims of the paper - Due to the rivalries and contestations present in the definition of contemporary art practice we ask how do ethnographers claiming to use art methods, understand the multiplicities of contemporary art researchTo explore in which ways contemporary art practice resembles participant ethnography
To recognise the difference between the terms artistic methods and art practice
To reach a better understanding of how contemporary art practice can contribute to ethnographic processes with people
To ask if contemporary art can de-assemble and re-assemble the social in ways that conventional ethnographic methods might not be able to achieve
Period | 28 Oct 2021 |
---|---|
Held at | Art & Design |
Degree of Recognition | International |
Documents & Links
- Hewitt_ETAL_2021_Why_do_social_art_projects_look_like_participant_ethnography
File: application/pdf, 2.72 MB
Type: Text
Related content
-
Research Outputs
-
Misrecognitions in the Practice of Art and Ethnography
Research output: Contribution to Book/Report › Chapter › peer-review
-
Projects
-
Spatial Practices in Art and ArChitecture for Empathetic EXchange (SPACEX)
Project: Research › European