A comparison of MOOC development and delivery approaches

Neil Smith, Helen Caldwell, Mike Richards, Arosha Bandara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We present a comparison of two ways of developing and delivering MOOCs. One was developed by the Open University in collaboration with FutureLearn; the other was developed independently by a small team at Northampton University. The different approaches had very different profiles of pedagogic flexibility, cost, development processes, institutional support, and participant numbers. This comparison shows that, even several years after MOOCs came to prominence, there is a range of viable approaches for MOOCs. MOOCs on existing large platforms can reach many thousands of people, but constrain pedagogical choice. Smaller, self-made MOOCs have smaller audiences but can target them more effectively.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Information and Learning Technology
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

pedagogics
flexibility
costs

Keywords

  • Distance learning
  • computer-based learning
  • E-learning
  • open learning

Cite this

@article{3e557ce96f5f46f5bc91b70e6ea8cbbf,
title = "A comparison of MOOC development and delivery approaches",
abstract = "We present a comparison of two ways of developing and delivering MOOCs. One was developed by the Open University in collaboration with FutureLearn; the other was developed independently by a small team at Northampton University. The different approaches had very different profiles of pedagogic flexibility, cost, development processes, institutional support, and participant numbers. This comparison shows that, even several years after MOOCs came to prominence, there is a range of viable approaches for MOOCs. MOOCs on existing large platforms can reach many thousands of people, but constrain pedagogical choice. Smaller, self-made MOOCs have smaller audiences but can target them more effectively.",
keywords = "Distance learning, computer-based learning, E-learning, open learning",
author = "Neil Smith and Helen Caldwell and Mike Richards and Arosha Bandara",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1108/IJILT-09-2016-0047",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
journal = "International Journal of Information and Learning Technology",
issn = "2056-4880",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "2",

}

A comparison of MOOC development and delivery approaches. / Smith, Neil; Caldwell, Helen; Richards, Mike; Bandara, Arosha.

In: International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, Vol. 34, No. 2, 30.03.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of MOOC development and delivery approaches

AU - Smith, Neil

AU - Caldwell, Helen

AU - Richards, Mike

AU - Bandara, Arosha

PY - 2017/3/30

Y1 - 2017/3/30

N2 - We present a comparison of two ways of developing and delivering MOOCs. One was developed by the Open University in collaboration with FutureLearn; the other was developed independently by a small team at Northampton University. The different approaches had very different profiles of pedagogic flexibility, cost, development processes, institutional support, and participant numbers. This comparison shows that, even several years after MOOCs came to prominence, there is a range of viable approaches for MOOCs. MOOCs on existing large platforms can reach many thousands of people, but constrain pedagogical choice. Smaller, self-made MOOCs have smaller audiences but can target them more effectively.

AB - We present a comparison of two ways of developing and delivering MOOCs. One was developed by the Open University in collaboration with FutureLearn; the other was developed independently by a small team at Northampton University. The different approaches had very different profiles of pedagogic flexibility, cost, development processes, institutional support, and participant numbers. This comparison shows that, even several years after MOOCs came to prominence, there is a range of viable approaches for MOOCs. MOOCs on existing large platforms can reach many thousands of people, but constrain pedagogical choice. Smaller, self-made MOOCs have smaller audiences but can target them more effectively.

KW - Distance learning

KW - computer-based learning

KW - E-learning

KW - open learning

U2 - 10.1108/IJILT-09-2016-0047

DO - 10.1108/IJILT-09-2016-0047

M3 - Article

VL - 34

JO - International Journal of Information and Learning Technology

JF - International Journal of Information and Learning Technology

SN - 2056-4880

IS - 2

ER -