A divergence of opinion: how those involved in child and family social work are responding to the challenges of the Internet and social media

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticle

Abstract

This discussion paper suggests that there is possibly a divergence of opinion taking place within the field of child and family social work and that the stated positions are influencing how practitioners identify and deal with risks and opportunities afforded by the Internet and social media. The suggested divergence is examined and the conclusion drawn is that what is taking place mirrors the fact that the introduction of any new technology inevitably brings with it division and debate.

In seeking to understand the reaction to digital technology consideration is given to a series of wider social discourses on childhood and risk which includes the controversial notion that the profession is a harbinger of moral panic and that the management of risk has been broadened from child protection to child safety. The discussion paper concludes by calling for child and family social work practitioners to have a balanced debate that needs to be not only informed by current research but also by an open and honest discussion about personal use and an acknowledgement
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-102
Number of pages8
JournalChild and Family Social Work
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date3 Dec 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

Social Media
Social Work
social media
Internet
divergence
social work
child protection
Technology
Panic
new technology
Risk Management
profession
childhood
discourse
Safety
management
Research

Cite this

@article{cfcbf892efb04bbb81e0756bbfa6d98a,
title = "A divergence of opinion: how those involved in child and family social work are responding to the challenges of the Internet and social media",
abstract = "This discussion paper suggests that there is possibly a divergence of opinion taking place within the field of child and family social work and that the stated positions are influencing how practitioners identify and deal with risks and opportunities afforded by the Internet and social media. The suggested divergence is examined and the conclusion drawn is that what is taking place mirrors the fact that the introduction of any new technology inevitably brings with it division and debate. In seeking to understand the reaction to digital technology consideration is given to a series of wider social discourses on childhood and risk which includes the controversial notion that the profession is a harbinger of moral panic and that the management of risk has been broadened from child protection to child safety. The discussion paper concludes by calling for child and family social work practitioners to have a balanced debate that needs to be not only informed by current research but also by an open and honest discussion about personal use and an acknowledgement",
author = "Jenny Simpson",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cfs.12114",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "94--102",
journal = "Child and Family Social Work",
issn = "1356-7500",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A divergence of opinion: how those involved in child and family social work are responding to the challenges of the Internet and social media

AU - Simpson, Jenny

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - This discussion paper suggests that there is possibly a divergence of opinion taking place within the field of child and family social work and that the stated positions are influencing how practitioners identify and deal with risks and opportunities afforded by the Internet and social media. The suggested divergence is examined and the conclusion drawn is that what is taking place mirrors the fact that the introduction of any new technology inevitably brings with it division and debate. In seeking to understand the reaction to digital technology consideration is given to a series of wider social discourses on childhood and risk which includes the controversial notion that the profession is a harbinger of moral panic and that the management of risk has been broadened from child protection to child safety. The discussion paper concludes by calling for child and family social work practitioners to have a balanced debate that needs to be not only informed by current research but also by an open and honest discussion about personal use and an acknowledgement

AB - This discussion paper suggests that there is possibly a divergence of opinion taking place within the field of child and family social work and that the stated positions are influencing how practitioners identify and deal with risks and opportunities afforded by the Internet and social media. The suggested divergence is examined and the conclusion drawn is that what is taking place mirrors the fact that the introduction of any new technology inevitably brings with it division and debate. In seeking to understand the reaction to digital technology consideration is given to a series of wider social discourses on childhood and risk which includes the controversial notion that the profession is a harbinger of moral panic and that the management of risk has been broadened from child protection to child safety. The discussion paper concludes by calling for child and family social work practitioners to have a balanced debate that needs to be not only informed by current research but also by an open and honest discussion about personal use and an acknowledgement

U2 - 10.1111/cfs.12114

DO - 10.1111/cfs.12114

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 94

EP - 102

JO - Child and Family Social Work

JF - Child and Family Social Work

SN - 1356-7500

IS - 1

ER -