Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A divergence of opinion: how those involved in child and family social work are responding to the challenges of the Internet and social media

  • Jenny Simpson

    Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › peer-review

    Abstract

    This discussion paper suggests that there is possibly a divergence of opinion taking place within the field of child and family social work and that the stated positions are influencing how practitioners identify and deal with risks and opportunities afforded by the Internet and social media. The suggested divergence is examined and the conclusion drawn is that what is taking place mirrors the fact that the introduction of any new technology inevitably brings with it division and debate.

    In seeking to understand the reaction to digital technology consideration is given to a series of wider social discourses on childhood and risk which includes the controversial notion that the profession is a harbinger of moral panic and that the management of risk has been broadened from child protection to child safety. The discussion paper concludes by calling for child and family social work practitioners to have a balanced debate that needs to be not only informed by current research but also by an open and honest discussion about personal use and an acknowledgement
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)94-102
    Number of pages8
    JournalChild and Family Social Work
    Volume21
    Issue number1
    Early online date3 Dec 2013
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A divergence of opinion: how those involved in child and family social work are responding to the challenges of the Internet and social media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this