Ageing well in the right place: partnership working with older people

Judith Sixsmith, Mei Lan Fang, Ryan Woolrych, Sarah Canham, Lupin Battersby, Andrew Sixsmith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The provision of home and community supports can enable people to successfully age-in-place by improving physical and mental health, supporting social participation and enhancing independence, autonomy and choice. One challenge concerns the integration of place-based supports available as older people transition into affordable housing. Sustainable solutions need to be developed and implemented with the full involvement of communities, service organisations and older people themselves. Partnership building is an important component of this process. This article details the intricacies of developing partnerships with low-income older people, local service providers and nonprofit housing associations in the context of a Canadian housing development. Design/methodology/approach: A community based participatory approach was used to inform the data collection and partnership building process. The partnership building process progressed through a series of democratized committee meetings based on the principles of appreciative inquiry, four collaboration cafés with nonprofit housing providers, and four community mapping workshops with low-income older people. Data collection also involved 25 interviews and 15 photovoice sessions with the housing tenants. The common aims of partnership and data collection were to: (i) understand the challenges and opportunities experienced by older people, service providers and nonprofit housing providers; (ii) identify the perspectives of service providers and nonprofit housing providers for the provision and delivery of senior-friendly services and resources; and (iii) determine actions that can be undertaken to better meet the needs of service providers and nonprofit housing providers in order to help them better serve older people. Findings: The partnership prioritised the generation of a shared vision together with shared values, interests and the goal of co-creating meaningful housing solutions for older people transitioning into affordable housing. Input from interviews and photovoice sessions with older people provided material to inform decision making in support of ageing well in the right place. Attention to issues of power dynamics and knowledge generation and feedback mechanisms enable all fields of expertise to be taken into account, including the experiential expertise of older residents. This resulted in functional, physical, psychological and social aspects of ageing in place to inform the new build housing complex. Research limitations/implications: The time and effort required to conduct democratized partnerships slowed the decision making process. Research limitations/implications: The time and effort required to conduct democratized partnerships slowed the decision making process. Originality/value: The findings confirm that the drive toward community partnerships is a necessary process in supporting older people to age well in the right place. This requires sound mechanisms to include the voice of older people themselves alongside other relevant stakeholders. Ageing well in a housing complex requires meaningful placemaking to include the functional, physical, psychological and social aspects of older people’s everyday life in respect to both home and community.
Original languageEnglish
JournalWorking with Older People
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date25 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

housing
service provider
community
decision making process
expertise
low income
social participation
housing development
community service
interview
everyday life
Values
autonomy
mental health
stakeholder
resident
decision making
methodology
resources
knowledge

Cite this

Sixsmith, J., Fang, M. L., Woolrych, R., Canham, S., Battersby, L., & Sixsmith, A. (2017). Ageing well in the right place: partnership working with older people. Working with Older People, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/WWOP-01-2017-0001
Sixsmith, Judith ; Fang, Mei Lan ; Woolrych, Ryan ; Canham, Sarah ; Battersby, Lupin ; Sixsmith, Andrew. / Ageing well in the right place: partnership working with older people. In: Working with Older People. 2017 ; Vol. 21, No. 1.
@article{5feac665d2194d90b137c600a88d4fde,
title = "Ageing well in the right place: partnership working with older people",
abstract = "Purpose: The provision of home and community supports can enable people to successfully age-in-place by improving physical and mental health, supporting social participation and enhancing independence, autonomy and choice. One challenge concerns the integration of place-based supports available as older people transition into affordable housing. Sustainable solutions need to be developed and implemented with the full involvement of communities, service organisations and older people themselves. Partnership building is an important component of this process. This article details the intricacies of developing partnerships with low-income older people, local service providers and nonprofit housing associations in the context of a Canadian housing development. Design/methodology/approach: A community based participatory approach was used to inform the data collection and partnership building process. The partnership building process progressed through a series of democratized committee meetings based on the principles of appreciative inquiry, four collaboration caf{\'e}s with nonprofit housing providers, and four community mapping workshops with low-income older people. Data collection also involved 25 interviews and 15 photovoice sessions with the housing tenants. The common aims of partnership and data collection were to: (i) understand the challenges and opportunities experienced by older people, service providers and nonprofit housing providers; (ii) identify the perspectives of service providers and nonprofit housing providers for the provision and delivery of senior-friendly services and resources; and (iii) determine actions that can be undertaken to better meet the needs of service providers and nonprofit housing providers in order to help them better serve older people. Findings: The partnership prioritised the generation of a shared vision together with shared values, interests and the goal of co-creating meaningful housing solutions for older people transitioning into affordable housing. Input from interviews and photovoice sessions with older people provided material to inform decision making in support of ageing well in the right place. Attention to issues of power dynamics and knowledge generation and feedback mechanisms enable all fields of expertise to be taken into account, including the experiential expertise of older residents. This resulted in functional, physical, psychological and social aspects of ageing in place to inform the new build housing complex. Research limitations/implications: The time and effort required to conduct democratized partnerships slowed the decision making process. Research limitations/implications: The time and effort required to conduct democratized partnerships slowed the decision making process. Originality/value: The findings confirm that the drive toward community partnerships is a necessary process in supporting older people to age well in the right place. This requires sound mechanisms to include the voice of older people themselves alongside other relevant stakeholders. Ageing well in a housing complex requires meaningful placemaking to include the functional, physical, psychological and social aspects of older people’s everyday life in respect to both home and community.",
author = "Judith Sixsmith and Fang, {Mei Lan} and Ryan Woolrych and Sarah Canham and Lupin Battersby and Andrew Sixsmith",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1108/WWOP-01-2017-0001",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "Working with Older People",
issn = "1366-3666",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "1",

}

Sixsmith, J, Fang, ML, Woolrych, R, Canham, S, Battersby, L & Sixsmith, A 2017, 'Ageing well in the right place: partnership working with older people', Working with Older People, vol. 21, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1108/WWOP-01-2017-0001

Ageing well in the right place: partnership working with older people. / Sixsmith, Judith; Fang, Mei Lan; Woolrych, Ryan; Canham, Sarah; Battersby, Lupin; Sixsmith, Andrew.

In: Working with Older People, Vol. 21, No. 1, 25.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ageing well in the right place: partnership working with older people

AU - Sixsmith, Judith

AU - Fang, Mei Lan

AU - Woolrych, Ryan

AU - Canham, Sarah

AU - Battersby, Lupin

AU - Sixsmith, Andrew

PY - 2017/1/25

Y1 - 2017/1/25

N2 - Purpose: The provision of home and community supports can enable people to successfully age-in-place by improving physical and mental health, supporting social participation and enhancing independence, autonomy and choice. One challenge concerns the integration of place-based supports available as older people transition into affordable housing. Sustainable solutions need to be developed and implemented with the full involvement of communities, service organisations and older people themselves. Partnership building is an important component of this process. This article details the intricacies of developing partnerships with low-income older people, local service providers and nonprofit housing associations in the context of a Canadian housing development. Design/methodology/approach: A community based participatory approach was used to inform the data collection and partnership building process. The partnership building process progressed through a series of democratized committee meetings based on the principles of appreciative inquiry, four collaboration cafés with nonprofit housing providers, and four community mapping workshops with low-income older people. Data collection also involved 25 interviews and 15 photovoice sessions with the housing tenants. The common aims of partnership and data collection were to: (i) understand the challenges and opportunities experienced by older people, service providers and nonprofit housing providers; (ii) identify the perspectives of service providers and nonprofit housing providers for the provision and delivery of senior-friendly services and resources; and (iii) determine actions that can be undertaken to better meet the needs of service providers and nonprofit housing providers in order to help them better serve older people. Findings: The partnership prioritised the generation of a shared vision together with shared values, interests and the goal of co-creating meaningful housing solutions for older people transitioning into affordable housing. Input from interviews and photovoice sessions with older people provided material to inform decision making in support of ageing well in the right place. Attention to issues of power dynamics and knowledge generation and feedback mechanisms enable all fields of expertise to be taken into account, including the experiential expertise of older residents. This resulted in functional, physical, psychological and social aspects of ageing in place to inform the new build housing complex. Research limitations/implications: The time and effort required to conduct democratized partnerships slowed the decision making process. Research limitations/implications: The time and effort required to conduct democratized partnerships slowed the decision making process. Originality/value: The findings confirm that the drive toward community partnerships is a necessary process in supporting older people to age well in the right place. This requires sound mechanisms to include the voice of older people themselves alongside other relevant stakeholders. Ageing well in a housing complex requires meaningful placemaking to include the functional, physical, psychological and social aspects of older people’s everyday life in respect to both home and community.

AB - Purpose: The provision of home and community supports can enable people to successfully age-in-place by improving physical and mental health, supporting social participation and enhancing independence, autonomy and choice. One challenge concerns the integration of place-based supports available as older people transition into affordable housing. Sustainable solutions need to be developed and implemented with the full involvement of communities, service organisations and older people themselves. Partnership building is an important component of this process. This article details the intricacies of developing partnerships with low-income older people, local service providers and nonprofit housing associations in the context of a Canadian housing development. Design/methodology/approach: A community based participatory approach was used to inform the data collection and partnership building process. The partnership building process progressed through a series of democratized committee meetings based on the principles of appreciative inquiry, four collaboration cafés with nonprofit housing providers, and four community mapping workshops with low-income older people. Data collection also involved 25 interviews and 15 photovoice sessions with the housing tenants. The common aims of partnership and data collection were to: (i) understand the challenges and opportunities experienced by older people, service providers and nonprofit housing providers; (ii) identify the perspectives of service providers and nonprofit housing providers for the provision and delivery of senior-friendly services and resources; and (iii) determine actions that can be undertaken to better meet the needs of service providers and nonprofit housing providers in order to help them better serve older people. Findings: The partnership prioritised the generation of a shared vision together with shared values, interests and the goal of co-creating meaningful housing solutions for older people transitioning into affordable housing. Input from interviews and photovoice sessions with older people provided material to inform decision making in support of ageing well in the right place. Attention to issues of power dynamics and knowledge generation and feedback mechanisms enable all fields of expertise to be taken into account, including the experiential expertise of older residents. This resulted in functional, physical, psychological and social aspects of ageing in place to inform the new build housing complex. Research limitations/implications: The time and effort required to conduct democratized partnerships slowed the decision making process. Research limitations/implications: The time and effort required to conduct democratized partnerships slowed the decision making process. Originality/value: The findings confirm that the drive toward community partnerships is a necessary process in supporting older people to age well in the right place. This requires sound mechanisms to include the voice of older people themselves alongside other relevant stakeholders. Ageing well in a housing complex requires meaningful placemaking to include the functional, physical, psychological and social aspects of older people’s everyday life in respect to both home and community.

U2 - 10.1108/WWOP-01-2017-0001

DO - 10.1108/WWOP-01-2017-0001

M3 - Article

VL - 21

JO - Working with Older People

JF - Working with Older People

SN - 1366-3666

IS - 1

ER -

Sixsmith J, Fang ML, Woolrych R, Canham S, Battersby L, Sixsmith A. Ageing well in the right place: partnership working with older people. Working with Older People. 2017 Jan 25;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/WWOP-01-2017-0001