Are Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) pedagogically innovative?

Alejandro Armellini, Brenda Cecilia Padilla Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While claims about pedagogic innovation in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are common, most reports provide no evidence to justify those claims. This paper reports on a survey aimed at exploring how different stakeholders describe MOOCs, focusing on whether they would consider them pedagogically innovative, and if so, why. Respondents (n = 106) described MOOCs primarily as free, openly accessible online courses that attract large numbers of participants. Views on pedagogic innovation fell into three categories: 1) MOOCs are pedagogically innovative (15.1%). Explanations referred to the massiveness, openness and connectivism. None of the participants offered a clear definition of or criteria for pedagogic innovation. 2) MOOCs are not pedagogically innovative (84.9%). More than half of the respondents added an unsolicited opinion, including strong criticisms of MOOCs. 3) MOOCs may or may not be pedagogically innovative. The evidence suggests that caution should be exercised when characterising MOOCs as pedagogically innovative.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Interactive Online Learning
Volume14
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

pedagogics
innovation
evidence
criticism
stakeholder

Keywords

  • MOOCs
  • pedagogic innovation
  • massiveness
  • openness
  • connectivism
  • MOORs

Cite this

@article{4bf3efb77a1b4cd58ccfc6001a6908d6,
title = "Are Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) pedagogically innovative?",
abstract = "While claims about pedagogic innovation in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are common, most reports provide no evidence to justify those claims. This paper reports on a survey aimed at exploring how different stakeholders describe MOOCs, focusing on whether they would consider them pedagogically innovative, and if so, why. Respondents (n = 106) described MOOCs primarily as free, openly accessible online courses that attract large numbers of participants. Views on pedagogic innovation fell into three categories: 1) MOOCs are pedagogically innovative (15.1{\%}). Explanations referred to the massiveness, openness and connectivism. None of the participants offered a clear definition of or criteria for pedagogic innovation. 2) MOOCs are not pedagogically innovative (84.9{\%}). More than half of the respondents added an unsolicited opinion, including strong criticisms of MOOCs. 3) MOOCs may or may not be pedagogically innovative. The evidence suggests that caution should be exercised when characterising MOOCs as pedagogically innovative.",
keywords = "MOOCs, pedagogic innovation, massiveness, openness, connectivism, MOORs",
author = "Alejandro Armellini and {Padilla Rodriguez}, {Brenda Cecilia}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "27",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "17",
journal = "Journal of Interactive Online Learning",
issn = "1541-4914",
publisher = "National Center for Online Learning Research",
number = "1",

}

Are Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) pedagogically innovative? / Armellini, Alejandro; Padilla Rodriguez, Brenda Cecilia.

In: Journal of Interactive Online Learning, Vol. 14, No. 1, 27.06.2016, p. 17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) pedagogically innovative?

AU - Armellini, Alejandro

AU - Padilla Rodriguez, Brenda Cecilia

PY - 2016/6/27

Y1 - 2016/6/27

N2 - While claims about pedagogic innovation in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are common, most reports provide no evidence to justify those claims. This paper reports on a survey aimed at exploring how different stakeholders describe MOOCs, focusing on whether they would consider them pedagogically innovative, and if so, why. Respondents (n = 106) described MOOCs primarily as free, openly accessible online courses that attract large numbers of participants. Views on pedagogic innovation fell into three categories: 1) MOOCs are pedagogically innovative (15.1%). Explanations referred to the massiveness, openness and connectivism. None of the participants offered a clear definition of or criteria for pedagogic innovation. 2) MOOCs are not pedagogically innovative (84.9%). More than half of the respondents added an unsolicited opinion, including strong criticisms of MOOCs. 3) MOOCs may or may not be pedagogically innovative. The evidence suggests that caution should be exercised when characterising MOOCs as pedagogically innovative.

AB - While claims about pedagogic innovation in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are common, most reports provide no evidence to justify those claims. This paper reports on a survey aimed at exploring how different stakeholders describe MOOCs, focusing on whether they would consider them pedagogically innovative, and if so, why. Respondents (n = 106) described MOOCs primarily as free, openly accessible online courses that attract large numbers of participants. Views on pedagogic innovation fell into three categories: 1) MOOCs are pedagogically innovative (15.1%). Explanations referred to the massiveness, openness and connectivism. None of the participants offered a clear definition of or criteria for pedagogic innovation. 2) MOOCs are not pedagogically innovative (84.9%). More than half of the respondents added an unsolicited opinion, including strong criticisms of MOOCs. 3) MOOCs may or may not be pedagogically innovative. The evidence suggests that caution should be exercised when characterising MOOCs as pedagogically innovative.

KW - MOOCs

KW - pedagogic innovation

KW - massiveness

KW - openness

KW - connectivism

KW - MOORs

UR - http://www.ncolr.org/

UR - http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/14.1.2.pdf

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 17

JO - Journal of Interactive Online Learning

JF - Journal of Interactive Online Learning

SN - 1541-4914

IS - 1

ER -