Art, its publics and an agenda of impact: the UK case

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This text considers UK ‘third way’ cultural policy and its agenda of impact that seeks to directly connect with processes of social and economic change via the commissioning of art and culture. I claim that publicly funded art commissioned as part of ‘impact policy’ is increasingly instrumentalized and this process has become complicit with and functional for an agenda of privatization and marketization. Here I use theories of the public sphere as a critical framework with which to interrogate this agenda for art in third way cultural policy. I propose that third way cultural policy produces debased public spheres. In order to understand how this occurs and in what ways the state utilizes art practice I present three forms of rhetoric common to third way cultural policy and public art commissioning. This articulation allows us to comprehend how cultural policy is a steering medium that promotes ideas of economics and ways of living that are increasingly informed by neoliberal values and that further undermine public interest, social justice, and democratic debate. Instead of a third way agenda for art we must consider the potential of the arts and their institutions as spaces where politics, difference, and futures can be expressed and debated.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalKunstlicht
    Volume37
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 12 Sep 2016

    Fingerprint

    Third Way
    cultural policy
    art
    public interest
    economic change
    social justice
    privatization
    social change
    rhetoric
    politics
    economics
    Values

    Cite this

    @article{1fc86575927a46a7b39ad6b95e42b20f,
    title = "Art, its publics and an agenda of impact: the UK case",
    abstract = "This text considers UK ‘third way’ cultural policy and its agenda of impact that seeks to directly connect with processes of social and economic change via the commissioning of art and culture. I claim that publicly funded art commissioned as part of ‘impact policy’ is increasingly instrumentalized and this process has become complicit with and functional for an agenda of privatization and marketization. Here I use theories of the public sphere as a critical framework with which to interrogate this agenda for art in third way cultural policy. I propose that third way cultural policy produces debased public spheres. In order to understand how this occurs and in what ways the state utilizes art practice I present three forms of rhetoric common to third way cultural policy and public art commissioning. This articulation allows us to comprehend how cultural policy is a steering medium that promotes ideas of economics and ways of living that are increasingly informed by neoliberal values and that further undermine public interest, social justice, and democratic debate. Instead of a third way agenda for art we must consider the potential of the arts and their institutions as spaces where politics, difference, and futures can be expressed and debated.",
    author = "Andrew Hewitt",
    year = "2016",
    month = "9",
    day = "12",
    language = "English",
    volume = "37",
    journal = "Kunstlicht",
    issn = "0921-5026",
    number = "1",

    }

    Art, its publics and an agenda of impact: the UK case. / Hewitt, Andrew.

    In: Kunstlicht, Vol. 37, No. 1, 12.09.2016.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Art, its publics and an agenda of impact: the UK case

    AU - Hewitt, Andrew

    PY - 2016/9/12

    Y1 - 2016/9/12

    N2 - This text considers UK ‘third way’ cultural policy and its agenda of impact that seeks to directly connect with processes of social and economic change via the commissioning of art and culture. I claim that publicly funded art commissioned as part of ‘impact policy’ is increasingly instrumentalized and this process has become complicit with and functional for an agenda of privatization and marketization. Here I use theories of the public sphere as a critical framework with which to interrogate this agenda for art in third way cultural policy. I propose that third way cultural policy produces debased public spheres. In order to understand how this occurs and in what ways the state utilizes art practice I present three forms of rhetoric common to third way cultural policy and public art commissioning. This articulation allows us to comprehend how cultural policy is a steering medium that promotes ideas of economics and ways of living that are increasingly informed by neoliberal values and that further undermine public interest, social justice, and democratic debate. Instead of a third way agenda for art we must consider the potential of the arts and their institutions as spaces where politics, difference, and futures can be expressed and debated.

    AB - This text considers UK ‘third way’ cultural policy and its agenda of impact that seeks to directly connect with processes of social and economic change via the commissioning of art and culture. I claim that publicly funded art commissioned as part of ‘impact policy’ is increasingly instrumentalized and this process has become complicit with and functional for an agenda of privatization and marketization. Here I use theories of the public sphere as a critical framework with which to interrogate this agenda for art in third way cultural policy. I propose that third way cultural policy produces debased public spheres. In order to understand how this occurs and in what ways the state utilizes art practice I present three forms of rhetoric common to third way cultural policy and public art commissioning. This articulation allows us to comprehend how cultural policy is a steering medium that promotes ideas of economics and ways of living that are increasingly informed by neoliberal values and that further undermine public interest, social justice, and democratic debate. Instead of a third way agenda for art we must consider the potential of the arts and their institutions as spaces where politics, difference, and futures can be expressed and debated.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 37

    JO - Kunstlicht

    JF - Kunstlicht

    SN - 0921-5026

    IS - 1

    ER -