Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Competing Logics and Organisational Barriers to Equality Work at Universities

  • Siobhan Dytham*
  • , Aura Lehtonen
  • , Carl Mallett
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Much has been written about the negative impacts of managerialism, bureaucracy and neoliberalism on education, students and staff. This article demonstrates that these structures are also holding back progress on equality. The article provides an analysis of interviews with 14 university employees about their involvement in closing Global Ethnic Majority awarding gaps in the UK, and highlights the presence of competing autonomous, utilitarian and managerial logics. The article identifies challenges that these competing logics create and concludes by recommending that leaders and managers understand and accept the presence of multiple logics in their institutions and provide more accommodating management approaches. Many university employees will not be motivated to engage in equality work by managerial or utilitarian logic, and university leaders would benefit from developing a better understanding and appreciation of other logics, which we argue is essential for equality work to flourish and achieve its aims.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Higher Education Policy and Management
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Sept 2025

Bibliographical note

© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Data Access Statement

Due to ethical restrictions supporting data is not available. More information is available at https://doi-org.northampton.idm.oclc.org/10.24339/3f9f8a88-7655-413c-805d-479a13c0038f

Keywords

  • equality
  • Universities
  • organisational logics
  • Managerialism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Competing Logics and Organisational Barriers to Equality Work at Universities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this