Containing acute childhood illness within family life: a substantive grounded theory

Sarah Neill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Acute childhood illness is a universal experience for children and families. This paper presents the central process of a Glaserian grounded theory study which explored family management of acute childhood illness at home. Twenty-nine interviews were conducted with 15 families of children 0–9 years of age. Constant comparative analysis generated the substantive grounded theory ‘Containing acute childhood illness within family life’. This informal social rule was identified from families’ persistent desire to do the right thing, for their child and in the eyes of others in social life. Families perceived that they were expected to contain illnesses which are defined as minor and to seek medical help for ‘real’ illnesses. Considerable uncertainty was evident around defining the illness and the legitimacy of seeking medical help. Their concern with the latter indicates doctors’ role as moral agents for parents’ behaviour, directing the containment of acute childhood illness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327–344
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Child Health Care
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Illegitimacy
Uncertainty
Grounded Theory
Parents
Interviews

Cite this

@article{da3c4a05bf80435f998142e11f79c8bb,
title = "Containing acute childhood illness within family life: a substantive grounded theory",
abstract = "Acute childhood illness is a universal experience for children and families. This paper presents the central process of a Glaserian grounded theory study which explored family management of acute childhood illness at home. Twenty-nine interviews were conducted with 15 families of children 0–9 years of age. Constant comparative analysis generated the substantive grounded theory ‘Containing acute childhood illness within family life’. This informal social rule was identified from families’ persistent desire to do the right thing, for their child and in the eyes of others in social life. Families perceived that they were expected to contain illnesses which are defined as minor and to seek medical help for ‘real’ illnesses. Considerable uncertainty was evident around defining the illness and the legitimacy of seeking medical help. Their concern with the latter indicates doctors’ role as moral agents for parents’ behaviour, directing the containment of acute childhood illness.",
author = "Sarah Neill",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1367493510380078",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "327–344",
journal = "Journal of Child Health Care",
issn = "1367-4935",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "4",

}

Containing acute childhood illness within family life: a substantive grounded theory. / Neill, Sarah.

In: Journal of Child Health Care, Vol. 14, No. 4, 01.09.2010, p. 327–344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Containing acute childhood illness within family life: a substantive grounded theory

AU - Neill, Sarah

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - Acute childhood illness is a universal experience for children and families. This paper presents the central process of a Glaserian grounded theory study which explored family management of acute childhood illness at home. Twenty-nine interviews were conducted with 15 families of children 0–9 years of age. Constant comparative analysis generated the substantive grounded theory ‘Containing acute childhood illness within family life’. This informal social rule was identified from families’ persistent desire to do the right thing, for their child and in the eyes of others in social life. Families perceived that they were expected to contain illnesses which are defined as minor and to seek medical help for ‘real’ illnesses. Considerable uncertainty was evident around defining the illness and the legitimacy of seeking medical help. Their concern with the latter indicates doctors’ role as moral agents for parents’ behaviour, directing the containment of acute childhood illness.

AB - Acute childhood illness is a universal experience for children and families. This paper presents the central process of a Glaserian grounded theory study which explored family management of acute childhood illness at home. Twenty-nine interviews were conducted with 15 families of children 0–9 years of age. Constant comparative analysis generated the substantive grounded theory ‘Containing acute childhood illness within family life’. This informal social rule was identified from families’ persistent desire to do the right thing, for their child and in the eyes of others in social life. Families perceived that they were expected to contain illnesses which are defined as minor and to seek medical help for ‘real’ illnesses. Considerable uncertainty was evident around defining the illness and the legitimacy of seeking medical help. Their concern with the latter indicates doctors’ role as moral agents for parents’ behaviour, directing the containment of acute childhood illness.

U2 - 10.1177/1367493510380078

DO - 10.1177/1367493510380078

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 327

EP - 344

JO - Journal of Child Health Care

JF - Journal of Child Health Care

SN - 1367-4935

IS - 4

ER -