Contemporary midwifery practice: Art, science or both?

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Current midwifery practice is regulated by the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), whose primary role is to safeguard the public through setting standards for education and practice and regulating fitness to practise, conduct and performance through rules and codes (NMC, 2012; 2015a). Practice is informed by evidence-based guidelines developed and implemented by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence based on hierarchies of evidence, with meta-analyses and systematic reviews being identified as the ‘gold standard’. This positivist epistemological approach as developed by Auguste Comte (1798–1857), with scientific evidence at the top of a knowledge hierarchy, fails to acknowledge the ‘art of midwifery’, where a constructivist paradigm of experiential, intuitive and tacit knowledge is used by reflective practitioners to provide high-quality care. As midwifery pre-registration education is now degree-level, is the essence of midwifery practice being ‘with woman’ providing holistic care under threat, as the drive for a systematic and analytical approach to decision-making gathers momentum?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)654-657
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Midwifery
Volume23
Issue number9
Early online date2 Sep 2015
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Sep 2015

Keywords

  • Contemporary midwifery practice
  • Midwifery
  • Midwife

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contemporary midwifery practice: Art, science or both?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this