Developing and exploring the validity of a patient reported experience measure for adult inpatient diabetes care

Olga Kozlowska; Amy Tallett; Samuel Bond; Sarah E Mansbridge; Helen Aveyard; Crispin Jenkinson; Alexander Dudbridge; Nicky McRobert; Alistair Lumb; Rustam Rea; Garry D Tan; Helen Walthall

doi:10.1111/dme.15266

Developing and exploring the validity of a patient reported experience measure for adult inpatient diabetes care

Olga Kozlowska
, Amy Tallett
, Samuel Bond
, Sarah E Mansbridge
, Helen Aveyard
, Crispin Jenkinson
, Alexander Dudbridge
, Nicky McRobert
, Alistair Lumb
, Rustam Rea
, Garry D Tan
, Helen Walthall

Psychology & Sociology

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

AIM: To develop and explore the validity of a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) for adult inpatient diabetes care.

METHOD: 27 in-depth interviews were conducted to inform the development of the 42-item PREM which was cognitively tested with 10 people. A refined 38-item PREM was piloted with 228 respondents completing a paper (n = 198) or online (n = 30) version. The performance of the PREM was evaluated by exploring (i) uptake/number of responses and (ii) survey validity by investigating whether the PREM data were of adequate quality and delivered useful information.

RESULTS: The PREM had low drop-out or missing data rates suggesting it was appropriately constructed. Analysis of item frequencies and variances, and problem score calculations concluded that questions provided sufficient score differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS: This new PREM allows for experiences of inpatient diabetes care to be measured, understood and reported on to help identify priority areas for improving care quality.

Original language	English
Article number	e15266
Journal	Diabetic Medicine
Volume	41
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.15266
Publication status	Published - 27 Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

Adult
Humans
Inpatients
Surveys and Questionnaires
Quality of Health Care
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Diabetes Mellitus/therapy

Access to Document

10.1111/dme.15266Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Koslowska_et_al_2023_Developing_and_exploring_the_validity_of_a_patient_reported_experience_measure_for_adult_inpatient_diabetes_careFinal published version, 247 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{b9eadfb153bc4fea8fce96e9d55c03bd,

title = "Developing and exploring the validity of a patient reported experience measure for adult inpatient diabetes care",

abstract = "AIM: To develop and explore the validity of a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) for adult inpatient diabetes care.METHOD: 27 in-depth interviews were conducted to inform the development of the 42-item PREM which was cognitively tested with 10 people. A refined 38-item PREM was piloted with 228 respondents completing a paper (n = 198) or online (n = 30) version. The performance of the PREM was evaluated by exploring (i) uptake/number of responses and (ii) survey validity by investigating whether the PREM data were of adequate quality and delivered useful information.RESULTS: The PREM had low drop-out or missing data rates suggesting it was appropriately constructed. Analysis of item frequencies and variances, and problem score calculations concluded that questions provided sufficient score differentiation.CONCLUSIONS: This new PREM allows for experiences of inpatient diabetes care to be measured, understood and reported on to help identify priority areas for improving care quality.",

keywords = "Adult, Humans, Inpatients, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Health Care, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Diabetes Mellitus/therapy",

author = "Olga Kozlowska and Amy Tallett and Samuel Bond and Mansbridge, \{Sarah E\} and Helen Aveyard and Crispin Jenkinson and Alexander Dudbridge and Nicky McRobert and Alistair Lumb and Rustam Rea and Tan, \{Garry D\} and Helen Walthall",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley \& Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.",

year = "2023",

month = dec,

day = "27",

doi = "10.1111/dme.15266",

language = "English",

volume = "41",

journal = "Diabetic Medicine",

issn = "0742-3071",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing and exploring the validity of a patient reported experience measure for adult inpatient diabetes care

AU - Kozlowska, Olga

AU - Tallett, Amy

AU - Bond, Samuel

AU - Mansbridge, Sarah E

AU - Aveyard, Helen

AU - Jenkinson, Crispin

AU - Dudbridge, Alexander

AU - McRobert, Nicky

AU - Lumb, Alistair

AU - Rea, Rustam

AU - Tan, Garry D

AU - Walthall, Helen

PY - 2023/12/27

Y1 - 2023/12/27

N2 - AIM: To develop and explore the validity of a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) for adult inpatient diabetes care.METHOD: 27 in-depth interviews were conducted to inform the development of the 42-item PREM which was cognitively tested with 10 people. A refined 38-item PREM was piloted with 228 respondents completing a paper (n = 198) or online (n = 30) version. The performance of the PREM was evaluated by exploring (i) uptake/number of responses and (ii) survey validity by investigating whether the PREM data were of adequate quality and delivered useful information.RESULTS: The PREM had low drop-out or missing data rates suggesting it was appropriately constructed. Analysis of item frequencies and variances, and problem score calculations concluded that questions provided sufficient score differentiation.CONCLUSIONS: This new PREM allows for experiences of inpatient diabetes care to be measured, understood and reported on to help identify priority areas for improving care quality.

AB - AIM: To develop and explore the validity of a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) for adult inpatient diabetes care.METHOD: 27 in-depth interviews were conducted to inform the development of the 42-item PREM which was cognitively tested with 10 people. A refined 38-item PREM was piloted with 228 respondents completing a paper (n = 198) or online (n = 30) version. The performance of the PREM was evaluated by exploring (i) uptake/number of responses and (ii) survey validity by investigating whether the PREM data were of adequate quality and delivered useful information.RESULTS: The PREM had low drop-out or missing data rates suggesting it was appropriately constructed. Analysis of item frequencies and variances, and problem score calculations concluded that questions provided sufficient score differentiation.CONCLUSIONS: This new PREM allows for experiences of inpatient diabetes care to be measured, understood and reported on to help identify priority areas for improving care quality.

KW - Adult

KW - Humans

KW - Inpatients

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - Quality of Health Care

KW - Patient Reported Outcome Measures

KW - Diabetes Mellitus/therapy

U2 - 10.1111/dme.15266

DO - 10.1111/dme.15266

M3 - Article

C2 - 38150334

SN - 0742-3071

VL - 41

JO - Diabetic Medicine

JF - Diabetic Medicine

IS - 4

M1 - e15266

ER -

Developing and exploring the validity of a patient reported experience measure for adult inpatient diabetes care

Abstract

Bibliographical note

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this