Digital physical activity intervention via the Kidney BEAM platform in patients with polycystic kidney disease: a randomised controlled trial

Juliet Briggs, Elizabeth Ralson, Thomas Wilkinson, Christy Walklin, Emmanuel Mangahis, Hannah Young, Ellen M. Castle, Roseanne Billany, Elham Asgari, Sunil Bhandari, Kate Bramham, James Burton, Jackie Campbell, Joseph Chilcot, Vashist Deelchand, Alexander Hamilton, Mark Jesky, Philip Kalra, Kieran McCafferty, Andrew NixonZoe Saynor, Maarten Taal, James Tollit, David Wheeler, Jamie Macdonald, Sharlene A. Greenwood*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background:
In people living with polycystic kidney disease (PKD), physical inactivity may contribute to poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To date, no research has elucidated the impact of a PKD-specific physical activity programme on HRQoL and physical health. This substudy of the Kidney BEAM Trial evaluated the impact of a PKD-specific 12-week educational and physical activity digital health intervention for people living with PKD.

Methods:
This study was a mixed-methods, single-blind, randomized waitlist-controlled trial. Sixty adults with a diagnosis of PKD were randomized 1:1 to the intervention or a waitlist control group. Primary outcome was difference in the Kidney Disease QoL Short Form 1.3 Mental Component Summary (KDQoL-SF1.3 MCS) between baseline and 12 weeks. Six participants completed individualized semi-structured interviews.

Results:
All 60 individuals (mean 53 years, 37% male) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 12 weeks, there was a significant difference in mean adjusted change in KDQoL MCS score between the intervention group and waitlist control [4.2 (95% confidence interval 1.0–7.4) arbitrary units, P = .012]. Significant between-group differences in KDQoL subscales—burden of kidney disease (P = .034), emotional wellbeing (P = .001) and energy/fatigue (P = .001)—were also achieved. There was no significant between-group difference in KDQoL PCS scores (P = .505). Per-protocol analyses revealed significant between group differences in the PAM-13 patient activation score (P = .010) and body mass (P = .027). Mixed-methods analyses revealed key influences of the programme, including opportunities for peer support and to build on new skills and knowledge, as well as the empowerment and self-management.

Conclusion:
A PKD-specific digital health educational and physical activity intervention is acceptable and has the potential to improve HRQoL. Further research is needed to better understand how specific education and lifestyle management may help to support self-management behaviour.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbersfaf041
Number of pages15
JournalCKJ: Clinical Kidney Journal
Volume18
Issue number3
Early online date12 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Feb 2025

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.

Keywords

  • Digital Health Intervention
  • Exercise
  • Physical Activity
  • Polycystic Kidney Disease
  • Quality of Life

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Digital physical activity intervention via the Kidney BEAM platform in patients with polycystic kidney disease: a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this