Effect sizes in memory research

Peter E Morris, Catherine O Fritz

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Effect sizes are omitted from many research articles and are rarely discussed. To help researchers evaluate effect sizes we collected values for the more commonly reported effect size measures (partial eta squared and d) from papers reporting memory research published in 2010. Cohen’s small, medium and large generic guideline values for d mapped neatly onto the observed distributions, but his values for partial eta squared were considerably lower than those observed in current memory research. We recommend interpreting effect sizes in the context of either domain-specific guideline values agreed for an area of research or the distribution of effect size estimates from published research in the domain. We provide cumulative frequency tables for both partial eta squared and d enabling authors to report and consider not only the absolute size of observed effects but also the percentage of reported effects that are larger or smaller than those observed
Original languageEnglish
JournalMemory
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013

Keywords

  • Effect size
  • statistical analysis

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effect sizes in memory research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this