Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms

  • Khaldoon Albitar*
  • , Nas Kolade
  • , Hussainey K
  • , A. M Gerged
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose
    This paper aims to investigate the effect of environmental, social, and governance disclosure (ESGD) on firm performance (FP) before and after the introduction of integrated reporting (IR) further to exploring a potential moderation effect of corporate governance (CG) mechanisms on this relationship.
    Design/methodology/approach
    Ordinary least squares (OLS) and firm-fixed effects models were estimated based on data related to FTSE 350 between 2009 and 2018. The data has been mainly collected from Bloomberg and Capital IQ. This analysis was supplemented with applying a two-stage least squares (2 SLS) model to address any concerns regarding the expected occurrence of endogeneity problems.
    Findings
    The results show a positive and significant relationship between ESGD score and firm performance before and after 2013, among a sample of FTSE 350. Furthermore, the study is suggestive of a moderation effect of CG mechanisms (i.e., ownership concentration, gender diversity and board size) on the ESGD-FP nexus. Additionally, this paper finds that firms voluntarily associated with IR have a tendency to achieve better firm financial performance.
    Practical implications
    The findings of the present study have several policy and practitioner implications. For example, managers may engage in ESGD to enhance their firms’ financial performance by the voluntary involvement in IR, which believed to help investors to rationalise their investment decisions. Likewise, the results reiterate the crucial need to integrate more social, environmental and economic regulations to promote sustainability in the UK. The paper also offers a systematic picture for policymakers in the UK as well as future researchers.
    Social implications
    The findings of this paper indicate that IR plays a significant role in the relationship between ESGD and FP, where IR firms seemed to be achieving better FP as compared with their nonIR counterparts. This implies that stakeholders may have played a magnificent effort to encourage firms’ voluntary engagement in IR in the UK.
    Originality/value
    To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explore the potential moderating effect of ownership concentration, gender diversity and board size on the relationship between ESGD and FP and to examine whether firms’ voluntary involvement in IR can lead to better FP after the introduction of IR in 2013 in the UK.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)429-444
    JournalInternational Journal of Accounting & Information Management
    Volume28
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 27 Mar 2020

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
      SDG 5 Gender Equality
    2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
      SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
    3. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
      SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this