Evaluation

Michelle Pyer; Helen Lomax; Paul Bramble

Evaluation

Michelle Pyer, Helen Lomax, Paul Bramble

Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned Report

Abstract

This report details the impact of the project and the co-designed educational programme (IO4), drawing from feedback obtained during the project as part of the design and evaluation process with children, teachers and parents in each of the four CyGen partner countries. These are: University of Northampton and University of Huddersfield in the United Kingdom (UK), VIA University College in Denmark (DK), UC Limburg in Belgium (BE) and the 2nd Elementary School of Kalamata, Greece (GK). A dedicated evaluation plan was developed at the outset of the project and implemented in parallel with the project’s development cycle. It was formative, drawing on creative and arts-based (Clark and Moss, 2011; Mannay 2015) and appreciative enquiry methods to capture:

• The ways in which children, parents and teachers experienced the project
• The impact of the project and the educational programme

Original language	English
Commissioning body	European Commission Erasmus +
Number of pages	67
Publication status	Published - 31 Aug 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

Pyer_etal_2019_CyGen_Evaluation_ReportFinal published version, 1.72 MB

http://cygen.eu/resources/evaluation/

Cite this

@book{0990b37a71884e23b35fe502bef4b316,

title = "Evaluation",

abstract = "This report details the impact of the project and the co-designed educational programme (IO4), drawing from feedback obtained during the project as part of the design and evaluation process with children, teachers and parents in each of the four CyGen partner countries. These are: University of Northampton and University of Huddersfield in the United Kingdom (UK), VIA University College in Denmark (DK), UC Limburg in Belgium (BE) and the 2nd Elementary School of Kalamata, Greece (GK). A dedicated evaluation plan was developed at the outset of the project and implemented in parallel with the project{\textquoteright}s development cycle. It was formative, drawing on creative and arts-based (Clark and Moss, 2011; Mannay 2015) and appreciative enquiry methods to capture:• The ways in which children, parents and teachers experienced the project• The impact of the project and the educational programme ",

author = "Michelle Pyer and Helen Lomax and Paul Bramble",

year = "2019",

month = aug,

day = "31",

language = "English",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Evaluation

AU - Pyer, Michelle

AU - Lomax, Helen

AU - Bramble, Paul

PY - 2019/8/31

Y1 - 2019/8/31

N2 - This report details the impact of the project and the co-designed educational programme (IO4), drawing from feedback obtained during the project as part of the design and evaluation process with children, teachers and parents in each of the four CyGen partner countries. These are: University of Northampton and University of Huddersfield in the United Kingdom (UK), VIA University College in Denmark (DK), UC Limburg in Belgium (BE) and the 2nd Elementary School of Kalamata, Greece (GK). A dedicated evaluation plan was developed at the outset of the project and implemented in parallel with the project’s development cycle. It was formative, drawing on creative and arts-based (Clark and Moss, 2011; Mannay 2015) and appreciative enquiry methods to capture:• The ways in which children, parents and teachers experienced the project• The impact of the project and the educational programme

AB - This report details the impact of the project and the co-designed educational programme (IO4), drawing from feedback obtained during the project as part of the design and evaluation process with children, teachers and parents in each of the four CyGen partner countries. These are: University of Northampton and University of Huddersfield in the United Kingdom (UK), VIA University College in Denmark (DK), UC Limburg in Belgium (BE) and the 2nd Elementary School of Kalamata, Greece (GK). A dedicated evaluation plan was developed at the outset of the project and implemented in parallel with the project’s development cycle. It was formative, drawing on creative and arts-based (Clark and Moss, 2011; Mannay 2015) and appreciative enquiry methods to capture:• The ways in which children, parents and teachers experienced the project• The impact of the project and the educational programme

M3 - Commissioned Report

BT - Evaluation

ER -

Evaluation

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this