Failure of further learning: activities, structure and meaning

Catherine O Fritz, Peter E Morris, Barbara Reid, Roya Aghdassi, Claire E Naven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Previous research has shown that little benefit is achieved through spaced study and recall of text passages after the first recall attempt, an effect that we term the failure-of-further-learning. We hypothesized that the effect occurs because a situation model of the text’s gist is formed when the text is first comprehended and is consolidated when recalled; it dominates later recall after verbatim memories of more recent study episodes have been lost. Experiments 1 and 2 attempted to circumvent the effect by varying the activities of participants and requiring interactive exploration. In both experiments, recall after four, weekly sessions showed little benefit beyond performance on the first recall. Experiment 3 interfered with the formation of an immediate situation model by introducing passages that were hard to comprehend without a title. Performance improved substantially across four sessions when titles were not supplied, but the standard effect was replicated when titles were given. Experiment 4 made verbatim memories available by incorporating all re-presentations and tests into one session; as predicted, recall improved over successive tests.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Psychology
Volume106
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2015

Fingerprint

Experiments
Data storage equipment

Keywords

  • Learning from text
  • fuzzy trace theory
  • memory
  • spacing
  • test practice

Cite this

Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., Reid, B., Aghdassi, R., & Naven, C. E. (2015). Failure of further learning: activities, structure and meaning. British Journal of Psychology, 106(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12060
Fritz, Catherine O ; Morris, Peter E ; Reid, Barbara ; Aghdassi, Roya ; Naven, Claire E. / Failure of further learning: activities, structure and meaning. In: British Journal of Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 106, No. 1.
@article{7eb7b8d30ff04cb48d6ebd704924ea5c,
title = "Failure of further learning: activities, structure and meaning",
abstract = "Previous research has shown that little benefit is achieved through spaced study and recall of text passages after the first recall attempt, an effect that we term the failure-of-further-learning. We hypothesized that the effect occurs because a situation model of the text’s gist is formed when the text is first comprehended and is consolidated when recalled; it dominates later recall after verbatim memories of more recent study episodes have been lost. Experiments 1 and 2 attempted to circumvent the effect by varying the activities of participants and requiring interactive exploration. In both experiments, recall after four, weekly sessions showed little benefit beyond performance on the first recall. Experiment 3 interfered with the formation of an immediate situation model by introducing passages that were hard to comprehend without a title. Performance improved substantially across four sessions when titles were not supplied, but the standard effect was replicated when titles were given. Experiment 4 made verbatim memories available by incorporating all re-presentations and tests into one session; as predicted, recall improved over successive tests.",
keywords = "Learning from text, fuzzy trace theory, memory, spacing, test practice",
author = "Fritz, {Catherine O} and Morris, {Peter E} and Barbara Reid and Roya Aghdassi and Naven, {Claire E}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/bjop.12060",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0007-1269",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

Fritz, CO, Morris, PE, Reid, B, Aghdassi, R & Naven, CE 2015, 'Failure of further learning: activities, structure and meaning', British Journal of Psychology, vol. 106, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12060

Failure of further learning: activities, structure and meaning. / Fritz, Catherine O; Morris, Peter E; Reid, Barbara; Aghdassi, Roya; Naven, Claire E.

In: British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 106, No. 1, 01.02.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Failure of further learning: activities, structure and meaning

AU - Fritz, Catherine O

AU - Morris, Peter E

AU - Reid, Barbara

AU - Aghdassi, Roya

AU - Naven, Claire E

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Previous research has shown that little benefit is achieved through spaced study and recall of text passages after the first recall attempt, an effect that we term the failure-of-further-learning. We hypothesized that the effect occurs because a situation model of the text’s gist is formed when the text is first comprehended and is consolidated when recalled; it dominates later recall after verbatim memories of more recent study episodes have been lost. Experiments 1 and 2 attempted to circumvent the effect by varying the activities of participants and requiring interactive exploration. In both experiments, recall after four, weekly sessions showed little benefit beyond performance on the first recall. Experiment 3 interfered with the formation of an immediate situation model by introducing passages that were hard to comprehend without a title. Performance improved substantially across four sessions when titles were not supplied, but the standard effect was replicated when titles were given. Experiment 4 made verbatim memories available by incorporating all re-presentations and tests into one session; as predicted, recall improved over successive tests.

AB - Previous research has shown that little benefit is achieved through spaced study and recall of text passages after the first recall attempt, an effect that we term the failure-of-further-learning. We hypothesized that the effect occurs because a situation model of the text’s gist is formed when the text is first comprehended and is consolidated when recalled; it dominates later recall after verbatim memories of more recent study episodes have been lost. Experiments 1 and 2 attempted to circumvent the effect by varying the activities of participants and requiring interactive exploration. In both experiments, recall after four, weekly sessions showed little benefit beyond performance on the first recall. Experiment 3 interfered with the formation of an immediate situation model by introducing passages that were hard to comprehend without a title. Performance improved substantially across four sessions when titles were not supplied, but the standard effect was replicated when titles were given. Experiment 4 made verbatim memories available by incorporating all re-presentations and tests into one session; as predicted, recall improved over successive tests.

KW - Learning from text

KW - fuzzy trace theory

KW - memory

KW - spacing

KW - test practice

U2 - 10.1111/bjop.12060

DO - 10.1111/bjop.12060

M3 - Article

VL - 106

JO - British Journal of Psychology

JF - British Journal of Psychology

SN - 0007-1269

IS - 1

ER -