Frivolity and vexation in private prosecutions. A line sensibly drawn: R (Morjaria) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2024] 1 Cr. App. R. 19

Dan Jasinski

Frivolity and vexation in private prosecutions. A line sensibly drawn: R (Morjaria) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2024] 1 Cr. App. R. 19

Dan Jasinski

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This case note deals with private prosecutions. Notably, through an analysis of the case of R (Morjaria) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court, the case note explores the issues arising where a private prosecution is sought for reasons other than in the interests of justice, with reference to the power of the Magistrates' Court to stay such proceedings as an abuse of process.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Criminal Law
Publication status	Accepted/In press - 15 May 2025

Bibliographical note

The author declared no conflicts of interest in relation to this paper.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

Abuse of process
Concurrent Proceedings
Duty of Candour
Judicial Review
Private Prosecutions

Cite this

@article{4a358cfd84064ad88fc2fd13b3f89e6a,

title = "Frivolity and vexation in private prosecutions. A line sensibly drawn: R (Morjaria) v Westminster Magistrates{\textquoteright} Court [2024] 1 Cr. App. R. 19",

abstract = "This case note deals with private prosecutions. Notably, through an analysis of the case of R (Morjaria) v Westminster Magistrates{\textquoteright} Court, the case note explores the issues arising where a private prosecution is sought for reasons other than in the interests of justice, with reference to the power of the Magistrates' Court to stay such proceedings as an abuse of process. ",

keywords = "Abuse of process, Concurrent Proceedings, Duty of Candour, Judicial Review, Private Prosecutions",

author = "Dan Jasinski",

note = "The author declared no conflicts of interest in relation to this paper. ",

year = "2025",

month = may,

day = "15",

language = "English",

journal = "Journal of Criminal Law",

issn = "0022-0183",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frivolity and vexation in private prosecutions. A line sensibly drawn

T2 - R (Morjaria) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2024] 1 Cr. App. R. 19

AU - Jasinski, Dan

N1 - The author declared no conflicts of interest in relation to this paper.

PY - 2025/5/15

Y1 - 2025/5/15

N2 - This case note deals with private prosecutions. Notably, through an analysis of the case of R (Morjaria) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court, the case note explores the issues arising where a private prosecution is sought for reasons other than in the interests of justice, with reference to the power of the Magistrates' Court to stay such proceedings as an abuse of process.

AB - This case note deals with private prosecutions. Notably, through an analysis of the case of R (Morjaria) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court, the case note explores the issues arising where a private prosecution is sought for reasons other than in the interests of justice, with reference to the power of the Magistrates' Court to stay such proceedings as an abuse of process.

KW - Abuse of process

KW - Concurrent Proceedings

KW - Duty of Candour

KW - Judicial Review

KW - Private Prosecutions

M3 - Article

SN - 0022-0183

JO - Journal of Criminal Law

JF - Journal of Criminal Law

ER -

Frivolity and vexation in private prosecutions. A line sensibly drawn: R (Morjaria) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2024] 1 Cr. App. R. 19

Abstract

Bibliographical note

UN SDGs

Keywords

Fingerprint

Cite this