Gender, Race and Ethnic Relations

Sebastian E Bartos, Peter Hegarty

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapter

Abstract

After the Second World War, ‘prejudice’ became an object of the new science of social psychology. Gordon Allport’s The Nature of Prejudice (1954) was both the defining text of this field and its most enduringly influential synthesis. In spite of numerous theoretical and terminological alternatives, ‘prejudice’ has remained prominent. The long-standing treatment of women as subordinates to men, usually termed sexism or misogyny, has been sometimes subsumed within the overall category of prejudice. As an increasing range of groups make collective claims for equal treatment, homophobia, fat prejudice, ableism, mental illness stigma and ageism have all become objects of study for social and political psychology (Nelson, 2009). In this chapter, we will be using the terms discrimination to designate the unfair treatment of certain groups (e.g. employers’ reluctance to hire ethnic minority individuals) and stereotypes to describe persistent overgeneralisations about groups (e.g. the belief that women are inherently nurturing). Overall, terminological nuances and disputes are beyond the scope of this chapter (for a discussion, see Dovidio et al., 2010). We aim to review and evaluate the attempts of social and political psychology to make sense of conflicts based on group identity.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology
PublisherSpringer
Chapter11
Pages187-203
Number of pages17
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Publication series

NamePalgrave Studies in Political Psychology Series
PublisherSpringer

Fingerprint

prejudice
social psychology
gender
political psychology
Group
equal treatment
sexism
World War
mental illness
national minority
stereotype
employer
discrimination
science

Cite this

Bartos, S. E., & Hegarty, P. (2014). Gender, Race and Ethnic Relations. In The Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology (pp. 187-203). (Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology Series). Springer.
Bartos, Sebastian E ; Hegarty, Peter. / Gender, Race and Ethnic Relations. The Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology. Springer, 2014. pp. 187-203 (Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology Series).
@inbook{d5eac06ea939433c88a6043a3c7f18bd,
title = "Gender, Race and Ethnic Relations",
abstract = "After the Second World War, ‘prejudice’ became an object of the new science of social psychology. Gordon Allport’s The Nature of Prejudice (1954) was both the defining text of this field and its most enduringly influential synthesis. In spite of numerous theoretical and terminological alternatives, ‘prejudice’ has remained prominent. The long-standing treatment of women as subordinates to men, usually termed sexism or misogyny, has been sometimes subsumed within the overall category of prejudice. As an increasing range of groups make collective claims for equal treatment, homophobia, fat prejudice, ableism, mental illness stigma and ageism have all become objects of study for social and political psychology (Nelson, 2009). In this chapter, we will be using the terms discrimination to designate the unfair treatment of certain groups (e.g. employers’ reluctance to hire ethnic minority individuals) and stereotypes to describe persistent overgeneralisations about groups (e.g. the belief that women are inherently nurturing). Overall, terminological nuances and disputes are beyond the scope of this chapter (for a discussion, see Dovidio et al., 2010). We aim to review and evaluate the attempts of social and political psychology to make sense of conflicts based on group identity.",
author = "Bartos, {Sebastian E} and Peter Hegarty",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
series = "Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology Series",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "187--203",
booktitle = "The Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology",

}

Bartos, SE & Hegarty, P 2014, Gender, Race and Ethnic Relations. in The Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology. Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology Series, Springer, pp. 187-203.

Gender, Race and Ethnic Relations. / Bartos, Sebastian E; Hegarty, Peter.

The Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology. Springer, 2014. p. 187-203 (Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology Series).

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Gender, Race and Ethnic Relations

AU - Bartos, Sebastian E

AU - Hegarty, Peter

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - After the Second World War, ‘prejudice’ became an object of the new science of social psychology. Gordon Allport’s The Nature of Prejudice (1954) was both the defining text of this field and its most enduringly influential synthesis. In spite of numerous theoretical and terminological alternatives, ‘prejudice’ has remained prominent. The long-standing treatment of women as subordinates to men, usually termed sexism or misogyny, has been sometimes subsumed within the overall category of prejudice. As an increasing range of groups make collective claims for equal treatment, homophobia, fat prejudice, ableism, mental illness stigma and ageism have all become objects of study for social and political psychology (Nelson, 2009). In this chapter, we will be using the terms discrimination to designate the unfair treatment of certain groups (e.g. employers’ reluctance to hire ethnic minority individuals) and stereotypes to describe persistent overgeneralisations about groups (e.g. the belief that women are inherently nurturing). Overall, terminological nuances and disputes are beyond the scope of this chapter (for a discussion, see Dovidio et al., 2010). We aim to review and evaluate the attempts of social and political psychology to make sense of conflicts based on group identity.

AB - After the Second World War, ‘prejudice’ became an object of the new science of social psychology. Gordon Allport’s The Nature of Prejudice (1954) was both the defining text of this field and its most enduringly influential synthesis. In spite of numerous theoretical and terminological alternatives, ‘prejudice’ has remained prominent. The long-standing treatment of women as subordinates to men, usually termed sexism or misogyny, has been sometimes subsumed within the overall category of prejudice. As an increasing range of groups make collective claims for equal treatment, homophobia, fat prejudice, ableism, mental illness stigma and ageism have all become objects of study for social and political psychology (Nelson, 2009). In this chapter, we will be using the terms discrimination to designate the unfair treatment of certain groups (e.g. employers’ reluctance to hire ethnic minority individuals) and stereotypes to describe persistent overgeneralisations about groups (e.g. the belief that women are inherently nurturing). Overall, terminological nuances and disputes are beyond the scope of this chapter (for a discussion, see Dovidio et al., 2010). We aim to review and evaluate the attempts of social and political psychology to make sense of conflicts based on group identity.

UR - https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-137-29118-9

M3 - Chapter

T3 - Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology Series

SP - 187

EP - 203

BT - The Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology

PB - Springer

ER -

Bartos SE, Hegarty P. Gender, Race and Ethnic Relations. In The Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology. Springer. 2014. p. 187-203. (Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology Series).