Implications of the fraud triangle for external auditors

Andrew Higson, Rasha Kassem

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapter

Abstract

In recent years the role of the external auditors in relation to the detection of fraud has come under scrutiny. In an effort to give guidance, the auditing standard setters have employed the “fraud triangle” (which originated from Cressey’s work [1950]) setting out pressures, opportunity and rationalisation behind frauds. Traditionally, it could be said that external auditors have focused on opportunity (i.e. through the assessment of internal controls). Since the mid - 1990s auditors have looked at high level risks and so have been considering pressures on management. However, the third aspect of the fraud triangle, namely rationalisation, seems to have been ignored. The point is that two people may experience the same pressures and have the same opportunity to commit a fraud, but depending on how they rationalise the situation, one may commit it whilst the other may not. The under appreciation of this aspect of the fraud triangle may mean there is a weakness in the external auditors’ approach.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 36th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association
Place of PublicationParis, France
PublisherEuropean Accounting Association
Number of pages20
Publication statusPublished - 2 May 2013

Fingerprint

Fraud
External auditor
Rationalization
Auditors
Internal control
Auditing standards
Guidance

Keywords

  • External auditors
  • financial statements fraud
  • management's motivations
  • financial reporting fraud
  • accounting manipulations
  • fraud triangle

Cite this

Higson, A., & Kassem, R. (2013). Implications of the fraud triangle for external auditors. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association Paris, France: European Accounting Association.
Higson, Andrew ; Kassem, Rasha. / Implications of the fraud triangle for external auditors. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association. Paris, France : European Accounting Association, 2013.
@inbook{dc91a7021f7240dda8ff42f16ec66331,
title = "Implications of the fraud triangle for external auditors",
abstract = "In recent years the role of the external auditors in relation to the detection of fraud has come under scrutiny. In an effort to give guidance, the auditing standard setters have employed the “fraud triangle” (which originated from Cressey’s work [1950]) setting out pressures, opportunity and rationalisation behind frauds. Traditionally, it could be said that external auditors have focused on opportunity (i.e. through the assessment of internal controls). Since the mid - 1990s auditors have looked at high level risks and so have been considering pressures on management. However, the third aspect of the fraud triangle, namely rationalisation, seems to have been ignored. The point is that two people may experience the same pressures and have the same opportunity to commit a fraud, but depending on how they rationalise the situation, one may commit it whilst the other may not. The under appreciation of this aspect of the fraud triangle may mean there is a weakness in the external auditors’ approach.",
keywords = "External auditors, financial statements fraud, management's motivations, financial reporting fraud, accounting manipulations, fraud triangle",
author = "Andrew Higson and Rasha Kassem",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "2",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 36th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association",
publisher = "European Accounting Association",

}

Higson, A & Kassem, R 2013, Implications of the fraud triangle for external auditors. in Proceedings of the 36th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association. European Accounting Association, Paris, France.

Implications of the fraud triangle for external auditors. / Higson, Andrew; Kassem, Rasha.

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association. Paris, France : European Accounting Association, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Implications of the fraud triangle for external auditors

AU - Higson, Andrew

AU - Kassem, Rasha

PY - 2013/5/2

Y1 - 2013/5/2

N2 - In recent years the role of the external auditors in relation to the detection of fraud has come under scrutiny. In an effort to give guidance, the auditing standard setters have employed the “fraud triangle” (which originated from Cressey’s work [1950]) setting out pressures, opportunity and rationalisation behind frauds. Traditionally, it could be said that external auditors have focused on opportunity (i.e. through the assessment of internal controls). Since the mid - 1990s auditors have looked at high level risks and so have been considering pressures on management. However, the third aspect of the fraud triangle, namely rationalisation, seems to have been ignored. The point is that two people may experience the same pressures and have the same opportunity to commit a fraud, but depending on how they rationalise the situation, one may commit it whilst the other may not. The under appreciation of this aspect of the fraud triangle may mean there is a weakness in the external auditors’ approach.

AB - In recent years the role of the external auditors in relation to the detection of fraud has come under scrutiny. In an effort to give guidance, the auditing standard setters have employed the “fraud triangle” (which originated from Cressey’s work [1950]) setting out pressures, opportunity and rationalisation behind frauds. Traditionally, it could be said that external auditors have focused on opportunity (i.e. through the assessment of internal controls). Since the mid - 1990s auditors have looked at high level risks and so have been considering pressures on management. However, the third aspect of the fraud triangle, namely rationalisation, seems to have been ignored. The point is that two people may experience the same pressures and have the same opportunity to commit a fraud, but depending on how they rationalise the situation, one may commit it whilst the other may not. The under appreciation of this aspect of the fraud triangle may mean there is a weakness in the external auditors’ approach.

KW - External auditors

KW - financial statements fraud

KW - management's motivations

KW - financial reporting fraud

KW - accounting manipulations

KW - fraud triangle

M3 - Chapter

BT - Proceedings of the 36th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association

PB - European Accounting Association

CY - Paris, France

ER -

Higson A, Kassem R. Implications of the fraud triangle for external auditors. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association. Paris, France: European Accounting Association. 2013