Liberalism and race equality in higher education: the shift from the mandatory to the persuasive

Andrew Pilkington, Melanie Crofts

Research output: Contribution to conference typesPaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines a twenty year period to explore the salience of race equality in higher education in the UK. While research evidence accumulates to demonstrate that staff and students from minority ethnic groups continue to experience considerable disadvantage, universities throughout the period have typically remained remarkably complacent. Such complacency partly stems from the dominance in the academy of a liberal as opposed to radical perspective on equality. Universities typically see themselves as liberal and believe existing policies ensure fairness and in the process ignore adverse outcomes and do not see combating racial inequalities as a priority. The paper distinguishes two ideal typical approaches, the ‘mandatory’ and the ‘persuasive’ to the promotion of race equality and suggests that the period has witnessed the transition along a continuum from the mandatory to the persuasive. Regardless of which approach is preferred, universities are urged to have no truck with a deficit model and to see it as their responsibility to take action to ensure more equitable outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jun 2017
Event3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'17) - Valencia, Spain
Duration: 21 Jun 2017 → …
http://www.headconf.org/

Conference

Conference3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'17)
Period21/06/17 → …
Internet address

Fingerprint

liberalism
equality
education
university
fairness
academy
ethnic group
deficit
promotion
minority
staff
responsibility
evidence
experience
student

Keywords

  • Equality and diversity
  • race and ethnicity
  • higher education
  • educational policy

Cite this

Pilkington, A., & Crofts, M. (2017). Liberalism and race equality in higher education: the shift from the mandatory to the persuasive. Paper presented at 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'17), .
Pilkington, Andrew ; Crofts, Melanie. / Liberalism and race equality in higher education: the shift from the mandatory to the persuasive. Paper presented at 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'17), .
@conference{b19b222945674119a2fc0a2aae2be6ac,
title = "Liberalism and race equality in higher education: the shift from the mandatory to the persuasive",
abstract = "This paper examines a twenty year period to explore the salience of race equality in higher education in the UK. While research evidence accumulates to demonstrate that staff and students from minority ethnic groups continue to experience considerable disadvantage, universities throughout the period have typically remained remarkably complacent. Such complacency partly stems from the dominance in the academy of a liberal as opposed to radical perspective on equality. Universities typically see themselves as liberal and believe existing policies ensure fairness and in the process ignore adverse outcomes and do not see combating racial inequalities as a priority. The paper distinguishes two ideal typical approaches, the ‘mandatory’ and the ‘persuasive’ to the promotion of race equality and suggests that the period has witnessed the transition along a continuum from the mandatory to the persuasive. Regardless of which approach is preferred, universities are urged to have no truck with a deficit model and to see it as their responsibility to take action to ensure more equitable outcomes.",
keywords = "Equality and diversity, race and ethnicity, higher education, educational policy",
author = "Andrew Pilkington and Melanie Crofts",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "21",
language = "English",
note = "3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'17) ; Conference date: 21-06-2017",
url = "http://www.headconf.org/",

}

Pilkington, A & Crofts, M 2017, 'Liberalism and race equality in higher education: the shift from the mandatory to the persuasive' Paper presented at 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'17), 21/06/17, .

Liberalism and race equality in higher education: the shift from the mandatory to the persuasive. / Pilkington, Andrew; Crofts, Melanie.

2017. Paper presented at 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'17), .

Research output: Contribution to conference typesPaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Liberalism and race equality in higher education: the shift from the mandatory to the persuasive

AU - Pilkington, Andrew

AU - Crofts, Melanie

PY - 2017/6/21

Y1 - 2017/6/21

N2 - This paper examines a twenty year period to explore the salience of race equality in higher education in the UK. While research evidence accumulates to demonstrate that staff and students from minority ethnic groups continue to experience considerable disadvantage, universities throughout the period have typically remained remarkably complacent. Such complacency partly stems from the dominance in the academy of a liberal as opposed to radical perspective on equality. Universities typically see themselves as liberal and believe existing policies ensure fairness and in the process ignore adverse outcomes and do not see combating racial inequalities as a priority. The paper distinguishes two ideal typical approaches, the ‘mandatory’ and the ‘persuasive’ to the promotion of race equality and suggests that the period has witnessed the transition along a continuum from the mandatory to the persuasive. Regardless of which approach is preferred, universities are urged to have no truck with a deficit model and to see it as their responsibility to take action to ensure more equitable outcomes.

AB - This paper examines a twenty year period to explore the salience of race equality in higher education in the UK. While research evidence accumulates to demonstrate that staff and students from minority ethnic groups continue to experience considerable disadvantage, universities throughout the period have typically remained remarkably complacent. Such complacency partly stems from the dominance in the academy of a liberal as opposed to radical perspective on equality. Universities typically see themselves as liberal and believe existing policies ensure fairness and in the process ignore adverse outcomes and do not see combating racial inequalities as a priority. The paper distinguishes two ideal typical approaches, the ‘mandatory’ and the ‘persuasive’ to the promotion of race equality and suggests that the period has witnessed the transition along a continuum from the mandatory to the persuasive. Regardless of which approach is preferred, universities are urged to have no truck with a deficit model and to see it as their responsibility to take action to ensure more equitable outcomes.

KW - Equality and diversity

KW - race and ethnicity

KW - higher education

KW - educational policy

UR - http://www.headconf.org/

M3 - Paper

ER -

Pilkington A, Crofts M. Liberalism and race equality in higher education: the shift from the mandatory to the persuasive. 2017. Paper presented at 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'17), .