Abstract
This article analyses the notebook of an eighteenth-century magistrate, Philip Ward. As Ward was especially diligent in recording the rationale behind his decision-making, it offers a unique insight into the summary process. The article considers the nature of the business that Ward dealt with and the amount of discretion he exercised in making his decisions. Throughout it draws upon the growing body of work on the role of the magistracy in the eighteenth century while also engaging with the long standing debate about the use of the law in the period. Importantly, since Ward was operating before Richard Burn published the first edition of his guide for JPs this particular magistrate drew upon his own legal experience and his father’s extensive law library. So while Ward was not making up the law as he went along he was working out how to apply it to the hearings that came before him. Thus this article will be of keen interest to historians of crime and the law as well as those interested in the social relations of the period
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 211-233 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | The Journal of Legal History |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- JP
- justice of the peace
- Oundle
- Ward
- crime
- summary justice
- law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Making law in mid-eighteenth-century England: legal statutes and their application in the justicing notebook of Phillip Ward of Stoke Doyle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver