Methods: why are effect sizes still neglected?

Peter E Morris, Catherine O Fritz

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticlepeer-review


This short paper reviews the reasons why effect sizes are worthy of reporting and consideration when interpreting results. It briefly describes the use of the more common effect sizes and provides examples where the use of effect sizes adds meaning to the research results
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)580-
JournalThe Psychologist
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2013


  • Statistical analysis
  • statistical interpretation
  • effect size


Dive into the research topics of 'Methods: why are effect sizes still neglected?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this