Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase the uptake of smoke alarms.

  • Nicola Cooper
  • , Denise Kendrick
  • , Felix Achana
  • , Paula Dhiman
  • , Zhimin He
  • , Persephone Wynn
  • , Elodie Pillet
  • , Pedro Saramago
  • , Alex Sutton

    Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › peer-review

    Abstract

    This study is the first known to use network meta-analysis to simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase the prevalence of functioning smoke alarms in households with children. The authors identified 24 primary studies from a systematic review of reviews and of more recently published primary studies, of which 23 (17 randomized controlled trials and 6 nonrandomized comparative studies) were included in 1 of the following 2 network meta-analyses: 1) possession of a functioning alarm: interventions that were more ‘‘intensive’’ (i.e., included components providing equipment (with or without fitting), home inspection, or both, in addition to education) generally were more effective. The intervention containing all of the aforementioned components was identified as being the most likely to be the most effective (probability (best) ¼ 0.66), with an odds ratio versus usual care of 7.15 (95% credible interval: 2.40, 22.73); 2) type of battery-powered alarms: ionization alarms with lithium batteries were most likely to be the best type for increasing functioning possession (probability (best) ¼ 0.69). Smoke alarm promotion programs should ensure they provide the combination of interventions most likely to be effective.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)32–45
    JournalEpidemiologic Reviews
    Volume34
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 29 Nov 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase the uptake of smoke alarms.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this