Physical methods used in pain measurements: a review

Jacqueline Ann Campbell*, Juan Lahuerta

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Leonardo da Vinci, 500 years ago, stressed the importance of mathematics in scientific investigations. However, before mathematics can be applied to the results of scientific observations to compare data, some form of measurement of those observations is required. This presents problems when the data consist of subjective sensations, and this paper is concerned with how the essentially qualitative subject of pain may yield quantitative data. Pain has been described by the Subcommittee on Taxonomy of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as 'an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage' (Merskey et al. 1979). This definition highlights two of the main difficulties encountered when trying to measure pain: (1) its multidimensional character - both sensory and emotional elements are present; and (2) its subjective nature. Pain, as a subjective experience, cannot be the object of direct empirical study. On the other hand, the experience of pain is frequently preceded, accompanied or followed by physiological, biochemical and behavioural events. Furthermore, humans have the ability to describe the several dimensions of their pain. These descriptions are probably related to neurophysiological mechanisms (Mayer & Price 1976). So, although one cannot equate pain either with an associated measurable phenomenon or with its description, useful links can be established between them which could eventually lead to a causal relationship. Whether a stimulus hurts or not is a totally subjective decision.It is always a qualitative statement, and mapping of the subjective intensity onto a numerical scale cannot make it into a true quantitative measure. Some measurements can be made along the nociceptive pathway with a high degree of accuracy. However, even if a perfect correlation could be made between such a physical measure and the subjective pain report, so that it could be used in its place, it will never be more accurate than the report itself. The search for a quantitative, reliable correlate of the pain experience has not yet produced an adequate 'measure' for pain. The following sections describe the areas that have been investigated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)409-414
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the royal society of medicine
Volume76
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 1983

Fingerprint

Pain Measurement
Pain
Mathematics
Aptitude

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Pain measurements
  • Physical methods
  • Quantiative
  • Research methods

Cite this

@article{8f7cd3125c214278a36a3e128ae87f79,
title = "Physical methods used in pain measurements: a review",
abstract = "Leonardo da Vinci, 500 years ago, stressed the importance of mathematics in scientific investigations. However, before mathematics can be applied to the results of scientific observations to compare data, some form of measurement of those observations is required. This presents problems when the data consist of subjective sensations, and this paper is concerned with how the essentially qualitative subject of pain may yield quantitative data. Pain has been described by the Subcommittee on Taxonomy of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as 'an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage' (Merskey et al. 1979). This definition highlights two of the main difficulties encountered when trying to measure pain: (1) its multidimensional character - both sensory and emotional elements are present; and (2) its subjective nature. Pain, as a subjective experience, cannot be the object of direct empirical study. On the other hand, the experience of pain is frequently preceded, accompanied or followed by physiological, biochemical and behavioural events. Furthermore, humans have the ability to describe the several dimensions of their pain. These descriptions are probably related to neurophysiological mechanisms (Mayer & Price 1976). So, although one cannot equate pain either with an associated measurable phenomenon or with its description, useful links can be established between them which could eventually lead to a causal relationship. Whether a stimulus hurts or not is a totally subjective decision.It is always a qualitative statement, and mapping of the subjective intensity onto a numerical scale cannot make it into a true quantitative measure. Some measurements can be made along the nociceptive pathway with a high degree of accuracy. However, even if a perfect correlation could be made between such a physical measure and the subjective pain report, so that it could be used in its place, it will never be more accurate than the report itself. The search for a quantitative, reliable correlate of the pain experience has not yet produced an adequate 'measure' for pain. The following sections describe the areas that have been investigated.",
keywords = "Pain, Pain measurements, Physical methods, Quantiative, Research methods",
author = "Campbell, {Jacqueline Ann} and Juan Lahuerta",
year = "1983",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/014107688307600516",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "409--414",
journal = "Journal of the royal society of medicine",
number = "5",

}

Physical methods used in pain measurements: a review. / Campbell, Jacqueline Ann; Lahuerta, Juan.

In: Journal of the royal society of medicine, Vol. 76, No. 5, 01.05.1983, p. 409-414.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physical methods used in pain measurements: a review

AU - Campbell, Jacqueline Ann

AU - Lahuerta, Juan

PY - 1983/5/1

Y1 - 1983/5/1

N2 - Leonardo da Vinci, 500 years ago, stressed the importance of mathematics in scientific investigations. However, before mathematics can be applied to the results of scientific observations to compare data, some form of measurement of those observations is required. This presents problems when the data consist of subjective sensations, and this paper is concerned with how the essentially qualitative subject of pain may yield quantitative data. Pain has been described by the Subcommittee on Taxonomy of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as 'an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage' (Merskey et al. 1979). This definition highlights two of the main difficulties encountered when trying to measure pain: (1) its multidimensional character - both sensory and emotional elements are present; and (2) its subjective nature. Pain, as a subjective experience, cannot be the object of direct empirical study. On the other hand, the experience of pain is frequently preceded, accompanied or followed by physiological, biochemical and behavioural events. Furthermore, humans have the ability to describe the several dimensions of their pain. These descriptions are probably related to neurophysiological mechanisms (Mayer & Price 1976). So, although one cannot equate pain either with an associated measurable phenomenon or with its description, useful links can be established between them which could eventually lead to a causal relationship. Whether a stimulus hurts or not is a totally subjective decision.It is always a qualitative statement, and mapping of the subjective intensity onto a numerical scale cannot make it into a true quantitative measure. Some measurements can be made along the nociceptive pathway with a high degree of accuracy. However, even if a perfect correlation could be made between such a physical measure and the subjective pain report, so that it could be used in its place, it will never be more accurate than the report itself. The search for a quantitative, reliable correlate of the pain experience has not yet produced an adequate 'measure' for pain. The following sections describe the areas that have been investigated.

AB - Leonardo da Vinci, 500 years ago, stressed the importance of mathematics in scientific investigations. However, before mathematics can be applied to the results of scientific observations to compare data, some form of measurement of those observations is required. This presents problems when the data consist of subjective sensations, and this paper is concerned with how the essentially qualitative subject of pain may yield quantitative data. Pain has been described by the Subcommittee on Taxonomy of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as 'an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage' (Merskey et al. 1979). This definition highlights two of the main difficulties encountered when trying to measure pain: (1) its multidimensional character - both sensory and emotional elements are present; and (2) its subjective nature. Pain, as a subjective experience, cannot be the object of direct empirical study. On the other hand, the experience of pain is frequently preceded, accompanied or followed by physiological, biochemical and behavioural events. Furthermore, humans have the ability to describe the several dimensions of their pain. These descriptions are probably related to neurophysiological mechanisms (Mayer & Price 1976). So, although one cannot equate pain either with an associated measurable phenomenon or with its description, useful links can be established between them which could eventually lead to a causal relationship. Whether a stimulus hurts or not is a totally subjective decision.It is always a qualitative statement, and mapping of the subjective intensity onto a numerical scale cannot make it into a true quantitative measure. Some measurements can be made along the nociceptive pathway with a high degree of accuracy. However, even if a perfect correlation could be made between such a physical measure and the subjective pain report, so that it could be used in its place, it will never be more accurate than the report itself. The search for a quantitative, reliable correlate of the pain experience has not yet produced an adequate 'measure' for pain. The following sections describe the areas that have been investigated.

KW - Pain

KW - Pain measurements

KW - Physical methods

KW - Quantiative

KW - Research methods

U2 - 10.1177/014107688307600516

DO - 10.1177/014107688307600516

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 409

EP - 414

JO - Journal of the royal society of medicine

JF - Journal of the royal society of medicine

IS - 5

ER -