Power and Responsibility: Advertising Self-regulation and Consumer Protection in a Digital World

Gayle Kerr, Kathleen Mortimer, Sonia Dickinson, David S Waller, Alice Kendric

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticle

Abstract

While advertising self-regulation is generally considered effective in a closed, largely country-based system, the digital world in which we now live is an open and global system. This raises challenges for consumer protection from national regulators trying to enforce compliance from global media platforms, advertisers and consumers. Applying the Power-Responsibility Equilibrium, this study explores who has the power and who has the responsibility for advertising self-regulation in a digital world. In doing so, it takes an ethnographic approach, eliciting insights from 18 key stakeholders in the self-regulatory process, across the three geographical areas of Europe, US and Asia-Pacific. The findings highlight the need for more collaboration and alignment of self-regulatory systems and build a framework for action through embedding responsibility, aligning standards, initiating processes and improving outcomes. Six recommendations are offered to restore the balance of power and responsibility.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Consumer Affairs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 11 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

consumer protection
self-regulation
responsibility
balance of power
stakeholder
Responsibility
Consumer protection
Self-regulation

Keywords

  • Advertising
  • Self-regulation
  • Power-Responsibility Equilibrium
  • Consumer Protection

Cite this

@article{0bc636b203ab42ada0c357ac0d83ed83,
title = "Power and Responsibility: Advertising Self-regulation and Consumer Protection in a Digital World",
abstract = "While advertising self-regulation is generally considered effective in a closed, largely country-based system, the digital world in which we now live is an open and global system. This raises challenges for consumer protection from national regulators trying to enforce compliance from global media platforms, advertisers and consumers. Applying the Power-Responsibility Equilibrium, this study explores who has the power and who has the responsibility for advertising self-regulation in a digital world. In doing so, it takes an ethnographic approach, eliciting insights from 18 key stakeholders in the self-regulatory process, across the three geographical areas of Europe, US and Asia-Pacific. The findings highlight the need for more collaboration and alignment of self-regulatory systems and build a framework for action through embedding responsibility, aligning standards, initiating processes and improving outcomes. Six recommendations are offered to restore the balance of power and responsibility.",
keywords = "Advertising, Self-regulation, Power-Responsibility Equilibrium, Consumer Protection",
author = "Gayle Kerr and Kathleen Mortimer and Sonia Dickinson and Waller, {David S} and Alice Kendric",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "11",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Affairs",
issn = "0022-0078",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Power and Responsibility: Advertising Self-regulation and Consumer Protection in a Digital World. / Kerr, Gayle; Mortimer, Kathleen; Dickinson, Sonia; Waller, David S; Kendric, Alice.

In: Journal of Consumer Affairs, 11.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power and Responsibility: Advertising Self-regulation and Consumer Protection in a Digital World

AU - Kerr, Gayle

AU - Mortimer, Kathleen

AU - Dickinson, Sonia

AU - Waller, David S

AU - Kendric, Alice

PY - 2019/12/11

Y1 - 2019/12/11

N2 - While advertising self-regulation is generally considered effective in a closed, largely country-based system, the digital world in which we now live is an open and global system. This raises challenges for consumer protection from national regulators trying to enforce compliance from global media platforms, advertisers and consumers. Applying the Power-Responsibility Equilibrium, this study explores who has the power and who has the responsibility for advertising self-regulation in a digital world. In doing so, it takes an ethnographic approach, eliciting insights from 18 key stakeholders in the self-regulatory process, across the three geographical areas of Europe, US and Asia-Pacific. The findings highlight the need for more collaboration and alignment of self-regulatory systems and build a framework for action through embedding responsibility, aligning standards, initiating processes and improving outcomes. Six recommendations are offered to restore the balance of power and responsibility.

AB - While advertising self-regulation is generally considered effective in a closed, largely country-based system, the digital world in which we now live is an open and global system. This raises challenges for consumer protection from national regulators trying to enforce compliance from global media platforms, advertisers and consumers. Applying the Power-Responsibility Equilibrium, this study explores who has the power and who has the responsibility for advertising self-regulation in a digital world. In doing so, it takes an ethnographic approach, eliciting insights from 18 key stakeholders in the self-regulatory process, across the three geographical areas of Europe, US and Asia-Pacific. The findings highlight the need for more collaboration and alignment of self-regulatory systems and build a framework for action through embedding responsibility, aligning standards, initiating processes and improving outcomes. Six recommendations are offered to restore the balance of power and responsibility.

KW - Advertising

KW - Self-regulation

KW - Power-Responsibility Equilibrium

KW - Consumer Protection

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Consumer Affairs

JF - Journal of Consumer Affairs

SN - 0022-0078

ER -