Reliability and validity of a measure of work-related subjective experiences among people with psychiatric disabilities: Commentary

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Designing a psychometric instrument is always a difficult task; yet, the authors have done well in creating the work-related subjective experiences measure. A number of studies have demonstrated that there are considerable benefits of employment for individuals with mental health needs (Lahelma, 1992; Boardman et al, 2003). Nevertheless, discrimination against individuals who declare any mental health issues is widespread with many desiring paid employment but few being actually employed (DH, 2010; Perkins and Rinaldi, 2002).

The measure
The exploratory factor analysis of the measure revealed three main components of the scale. The first of these consisted of symptom control and relating to others. This in our own research (Biggs et al, 2010) was a concern that employers and employment agencies putting forward potential employees had with individuals with mental health needs. In other words, how do people with mental health needs relate to those around them, be it customers or colleagues? The second factor concerned with memory and thinking was also highlighted as a concern of performance by employers. Would individuals that had previous or existing mental health issues remember aspects of the job taught to them? The final factor of psychological distress was also highly useful, especially if used in conjunction with a measure such as the general health questionnaire. Further research with different participants could see modeling of the data using a confirmatory factor analysis. However, using the measure as a whole is likely to give an indication of how to rehabilitate those that have a previous or existing psychiatric disorder.

“The measure, if used correctly, may aid individuals seeking employment opportunities.”

Conclusions
The work-related subjective experiences measure is a useful addition to the literature. The authors suggestion of its use with trained practitioners in either clinical or occupational psychology is to be applauded. The measure, if used correctly, may aid individuals seeking employment opportunities. This, as the literature has shown, is important to individuals with previous or existing mental health needs. It is also important for society to give employment to these individuals.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and validity of a measure of work-related subjective experiences among people with psychiatric disabilities: Commentary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this