Renaissance women: Brigid Brophy, Mary McCarthy and the public intellectual

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Unashamedly intellectual, idiosyncratic, and often contrarian, Mary McCarthy and Brigid Brophy stood out amongst late twentieth century female writers not only as public intellectuals, but for the way their writing and social commentary cut against the grain on pivotal issues of progress, freedom, and aesthetic form, exposing and often satirising the hypocrisy of their male contemporaries. From the mid-twentieth-century onwards, on both sides of the Atlantic, the public intellectual took on a prominent and sharply defined role; Brophy and McCarthy developed complementary, dissident positions that provided a counter-model to the mainstream liberalism of such male intellectuals, opening an alternative space for female writers in the late twentieth- and early twenty-first-century. By unpacking their shared aesthetic practices and values, including the influence of a cultural Catholicism and an intense investment in the Italian Renaissance, this essay uncovers their role in establishing an alternative model of public intellectual that continues to influence the status of female writers and thinkers.
Original languageEnglish
JournalContemporary Women's Writing
Early online date24 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Public Intellectuals
Writer
Aesthetics
Thinkers
Catholicism
Cut
Hypocrisy
Dissidents
Liberalism
Italian Renaissance
Social Commentary

Keywords

  • Mary McCarthy
  • Brigid Brophy
  • literature
  • public intellectual

Cite this

@article{58deecf1d8b74e22872d1dbe169b4a4c,
title = "Renaissance women: Brigid Brophy, Mary McCarthy and the public intellectual",
abstract = "Unashamedly intellectual, idiosyncratic, and often contrarian, Mary McCarthy and Brigid Brophy stood out amongst late twentieth century female writers not only as public intellectuals, but for the way their writing and social commentary cut against the grain on pivotal issues of progress, freedom, and aesthetic form, exposing and often satirising the hypocrisy of their male contemporaries. From the mid-twentieth-century onwards, on both sides of the Atlantic, the public intellectual took on a prominent and sharply defined role; Brophy and McCarthy developed complementary, dissident positions that provided a counter-model to the mainstream liberalism of such male intellectuals, opening an alternative space for female writers in the late twentieth- and early twenty-first-century. By unpacking their shared aesthetic practices and values, including the influence of a cultural Catholicism and an intense investment in the Italian Renaissance, this essay uncovers their role in establishing an alternative model of public intellectual that continues to influence the status of female writers and thinkers.",
keywords = "Mary McCarthy, Brigid Brophy, literature, public intellectual",
author = "Reese, {Sam V H}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1093/cwwrit/vpy003",
language = "English",
journal = "Contemporary Women's Writing",
issn = "1754-1484",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Renaissance women: Brigid Brophy, Mary McCarthy and the public intellectual

AU - Reese, Sam V H

PY - 2018/2/24

Y1 - 2018/2/24

N2 - Unashamedly intellectual, idiosyncratic, and often contrarian, Mary McCarthy and Brigid Brophy stood out amongst late twentieth century female writers not only as public intellectuals, but for the way their writing and social commentary cut against the grain on pivotal issues of progress, freedom, and aesthetic form, exposing and often satirising the hypocrisy of their male contemporaries. From the mid-twentieth-century onwards, on both sides of the Atlantic, the public intellectual took on a prominent and sharply defined role; Brophy and McCarthy developed complementary, dissident positions that provided a counter-model to the mainstream liberalism of such male intellectuals, opening an alternative space for female writers in the late twentieth- and early twenty-first-century. By unpacking their shared aesthetic practices and values, including the influence of a cultural Catholicism and an intense investment in the Italian Renaissance, this essay uncovers their role in establishing an alternative model of public intellectual that continues to influence the status of female writers and thinkers.

AB - Unashamedly intellectual, idiosyncratic, and often contrarian, Mary McCarthy and Brigid Brophy stood out amongst late twentieth century female writers not only as public intellectuals, but for the way their writing and social commentary cut against the grain on pivotal issues of progress, freedom, and aesthetic form, exposing and often satirising the hypocrisy of their male contemporaries. From the mid-twentieth-century onwards, on both sides of the Atlantic, the public intellectual took on a prominent and sharply defined role; Brophy and McCarthy developed complementary, dissident positions that provided a counter-model to the mainstream liberalism of such male intellectuals, opening an alternative space for female writers in the late twentieth- and early twenty-first-century. By unpacking their shared aesthetic practices and values, including the influence of a cultural Catholicism and an intense investment in the Italian Renaissance, this essay uncovers their role in establishing an alternative model of public intellectual that continues to influence the status of female writers and thinkers.

KW - Mary McCarthy

KW - Brigid Brophy

KW - literature

KW - public intellectual

U2 - 10.1093/cwwrit/vpy003

DO - 10.1093/cwwrit/vpy003

M3 - Article

JO - Contemporary Women's Writing

JF - Contemporary Women's Writing

SN - 1754-1484

ER -