Social enterprise: evaluation of an enterprise skills programme

Simon Denny, Richard Hazenberg, Wray Irwin, Frederick A Seddon

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticle

Abstract

Purpose – Evaluation of employment skills programmes (ESP) delivered by work integration social enterprises (WISEs) for the benefit of young people not in employment, education or training (NEET) is often undertaken by the programme providers. This method of evaluation often lacks objectivity and academic rigour and tends to focus exclusively on output. The current study reveals programme outcome benefits for NEET participants after completing a six-week ESP, delivered by a WISE. The study highlights the participant perspective and adds an objective dimension to programme evaluation through an innovative, inductive evaluation process. Design/methodology/approach - The research adopted an intervention method, within a qualitative paradigm, employing semi-structured interviews conducted pre-and post participant engagement in the ESP. NEET participants were also asked to complete questionnaires designed to measure general self-efficacy and attitude to enterprise. The questionnaires were introduced in order to test the suitability of this type of questionnaire with NEET groups in future larger-scale studies. Findings - Analysis of the interview data revealed ten overall participant perception themes: ‘experience’, ‘self-confidence’, ‘the programme’, ‘perceived barriers’ and ‘maturity’ at Time 1 and ‘experience’, ‘self-confidence’, ‘the programme’, ‘enterprise’ and ‘future’ at Time 2. Outcome benefits are demonstrated through differences in participant perception themes revealed at Time 1 and Time 2. Relationships between participant perception themes and questionnaire constructs are discussed in the context of future larger-scale evaluations. Originality/value – Adopting an intervention method employing semi-structured interviews, allowed the participant’s to articulate the outcome benefits that were important for them rather than merely providing affirmation of programme provider’s expectations. Keywords – Evaluation, Validity, Enterprise Skills, Social Enterprise, NEETs Paper type Research paper
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Pages (from-to)150-172
Number of pages23
JournalSocial Enterprise Journal
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011

Fingerprint

evaluation
questionnaire
self-confidence
social integration
education
interview
study program
objectivity
maturity
self-efficacy
experience
paradigm
time
lack
methodology
Values
Group

Cite this

Denny, Simon ; Hazenberg, Richard ; Irwin, Wray ; Seddon, Frederick A. / Social enterprise: evaluation of an enterprise skills programme. In: Social Enterprise Journal. 2011 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 150-172.
@article{665239adf9a34b6e9a0e58f5b166b63b,
title = "Social enterprise: evaluation of an enterprise skills programme",
abstract = "Purpose – Evaluation of employment skills programmes (ESP) delivered by work integration social enterprises (WISEs) for the benefit of young people not in employment, education or training (NEET) is often undertaken by the programme providers. This method of evaluation often lacks objectivity and academic rigour and tends to focus exclusively on output. The current study reveals programme outcome benefits for NEET participants after completing a six-week ESP, delivered by a WISE. The study highlights the participant perspective and adds an objective dimension to programme evaluation through an innovative, inductive evaluation process. Design/methodology/approach - The research adopted an intervention method, within a qualitative paradigm, employing semi-structured interviews conducted pre-and post participant engagement in the ESP. NEET participants were also asked to complete questionnaires designed to measure general self-efficacy and attitude to enterprise. The questionnaires were introduced in order to test the suitability of this type of questionnaire with NEET groups in future larger-scale studies. Findings - Analysis of the interview data revealed ten overall participant perception themes: ‘experience’, ‘self-confidence’, ‘the programme’, ‘perceived barriers’ and ‘maturity’ at Time 1 and ‘experience’, ‘self-confidence’, ‘the programme’, ‘enterprise’ and ‘future’ at Time 2. Outcome benefits are demonstrated through differences in participant perception themes revealed at Time 1 and Time 2. Relationships between participant perception themes and questionnaire constructs are discussed in the context of future larger-scale evaluations. Originality/value – Adopting an intervention method employing semi-structured interviews, allowed the participant’s to articulate the outcome benefits that were important for them rather than merely providing affirmation of programme provider’s expectations. Keywords – Evaluation, Validity, Enterprise Skills, Social Enterprise, NEETs Paper type Research paper",
author = "Simon Denny and Richard Hazenberg and Wray Irwin and Seddon, {Frederick A}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/17508611111156619",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "150--172",
journal = "Social Enterprise Journal",
issn = "1750-8614",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "2",

}

Social enterprise: evaluation of an enterprise skills programme. / Denny, Simon; Hazenberg, Richard; Irwin, Wray; Seddon, Frederick A.

In: Social Enterprise Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2, 01.01.2011, p. 150-172.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social enterprise: evaluation of an enterprise skills programme

AU - Denny, Simon

AU - Hazenberg, Richard

AU - Irwin, Wray

AU - Seddon, Frederick A

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Purpose – Evaluation of employment skills programmes (ESP) delivered by work integration social enterprises (WISEs) for the benefit of young people not in employment, education or training (NEET) is often undertaken by the programme providers. This method of evaluation often lacks objectivity and academic rigour and tends to focus exclusively on output. The current study reveals programme outcome benefits for NEET participants after completing a six-week ESP, delivered by a WISE. The study highlights the participant perspective and adds an objective dimension to programme evaluation through an innovative, inductive evaluation process. Design/methodology/approach - The research adopted an intervention method, within a qualitative paradigm, employing semi-structured interviews conducted pre-and post participant engagement in the ESP. NEET participants were also asked to complete questionnaires designed to measure general self-efficacy and attitude to enterprise. The questionnaires were introduced in order to test the suitability of this type of questionnaire with NEET groups in future larger-scale studies. Findings - Analysis of the interview data revealed ten overall participant perception themes: ‘experience’, ‘self-confidence’, ‘the programme’, ‘perceived barriers’ and ‘maturity’ at Time 1 and ‘experience’, ‘self-confidence’, ‘the programme’, ‘enterprise’ and ‘future’ at Time 2. Outcome benefits are demonstrated through differences in participant perception themes revealed at Time 1 and Time 2. Relationships between participant perception themes and questionnaire constructs are discussed in the context of future larger-scale evaluations. Originality/value – Adopting an intervention method employing semi-structured interviews, allowed the participant’s to articulate the outcome benefits that were important for them rather than merely providing affirmation of programme provider’s expectations. Keywords – Evaluation, Validity, Enterprise Skills, Social Enterprise, NEETs Paper type Research paper

AB - Purpose – Evaluation of employment skills programmes (ESP) delivered by work integration social enterprises (WISEs) for the benefit of young people not in employment, education or training (NEET) is often undertaken by the programme providers. This method of evaluation often lacks objectivity and academic rigour and tends to focus exclusively on output. The current study reveals programme outcome benefits for NEET participants after completing a six-week ESP, delivered by a WISE. The study highlights the participant perspective and adds an objective dimension to programme evaluation through an innovative, inductive evaluation process. Design/methodology/approach - The research adopted an intervention method, within a qualitative paradigm, employing semi-structured interviews conducted pre-and post participant engagement in the ESP. NEET participants were also asked to complete questionnaires designed to measure general self-efficacy and attitude to enterprise. The questionnaires were introduced in order to test the suitability of this type of questionnaire with NEET groups in future larger-scale studies. Findings - Analysis of the interview data revealed ten overall participant perception themes: ‘experience’, ‘self-confidence’, ‘the programme’, ‘perceived barriers’ and ‘maturity’ at Time 1 and ‘experience’, ‘self-confidence’, ‘the programme’, ‘enterprise’ and ‘future’ at Time 2. Outcome benefits are demonstrated through differences in participant perception themes revealed at Time 1 and Time 2. Relationships between participant perception themes and questionnaire constructs are discussed in the context of future larger-scale evaluations. Originality/value – Adopting an intervention method employing semi-structured interviews, allowed the participant’s to articulate the outcome benefits that were important for them rather than merely providing affirmation of programme provider’s expectations. Keywords – Evaluation, Validity, Enterprise Skills, Social Enterprise, NEETs Paper type Research paper

UR - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/rss/1750-8614.xml

U2 - 10.1108/17508611111156619

DO - 10.1108/17508611111156619

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 150

EP - 172

JO - Social Enterprise Journal

JF - Social Enterprise Journal

SN - 1750-8614

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -