Textual analysis as a document of research

    Research output: Non-textual form typesExhibitionResearch

    Abstract

    What are the documents of research in the field of English Literature? Of course the obvious answer is the text, primary or secondary. But whilst contemplating a project such as a PhD how do we, as literary scholars, work through what we will and won’t include and which aspects of the textual analysis become part of the finished project? Peter Ackroyd’s London: The Biography is one of the first texts I was working with at the beginning of my PhD. I remember seeing it in a Waterstones bookstore in Bloomsbury, following one of my first supervisory meetings at the British Library. The process of wondering through the streets and the bookshops of my subject matter somehow felt like part of my research, and at the beginning of the process I thought the writings of Ackroyd was going to be integral. I wrote two draft chapters on his work, but the direction of the thesis changed, and though the London setting remained significant, Ackroyd’s texts, like the streets of the city itself, became more thresholds for wider theoretical engagement, as opposed to subject matter. In the final thesis I refer to Ackroyd seventeen times. Yet, this copy of London: The Biography reminds me of the many hours spent meandering not only through the city streets, or the many and the various literary representations, but also the more general various lines of enquiry, as I considered and reconsidered many approaches, eventually working through to map the literature of the city in my own way. One of the first skills we learn as literary scholars is that of ‘active reading’ as we create our own text almost symbiotically with the primary reading. This document, of me learning about my subject, and how to be a literary scholar, reminds me of the on-going process and evolution of my research methods. Thankfully, the many hours of work which didn’t make the final PhD went on to inform the design of the undergraduate module, ‘Urban Visions’. Positioning the module guide alongside Ackroyd’s text reminds me of the process of a PhD in literature, in that many different thoughts are explored, until a very select and defined approach is finally decided on. Thankfully, rejected work can often find a different life beyond the thesis, and is, after all, a necessary part of the process. Claire Allen, PhD: Beyond Postmodernism: London Fiction at the Millennium
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - 16 Feb 2018
    EventWithout End: Documents of Research - The University of Northampton
    Duration: 16 Feb 2018 → …
    https://withoutend2018.com/

    Fingerprint

    English literature
    postmodernism
    research method
    learning
    literature

    Cite this

    @misc{af12aab09ef7416ab9d916e7ba681068,
    title = "Textual analysis as a document of research",
    abstract = "What are the documents of research in the field of English Literature? Of course the obvious answer is the text, primary or secondary. But whilst contemplating a project such as a PhD how do we, as literary scholars, work through what we will and won’t include and which aspects of the textual analysis become part of the finished project? Peter Ackroyd’s London: The Biography is one of the first texts I was working with at the beginning of my PhD. I remember seeing it in a Waterstones bookstore in Bloomsbury, following one of my first supervisory meetings at the British Library. The process of wondering through the streets and the bookshops of my subject matter somehow felt like part of my research, and at the beginning of the process I thought the writings of Ackroyd was going to be integral. I wrote two draft chapters on his work, but the direction of the thesis changed, and though the London setting remained significant, Ackroyd’s texts, like the streets of the city itself, became more thresholds for wider theoretical engagement, as opposed to subject matter. In the final thesis I refer to Ackroyd seventeen times. Yet, this copy of London: The Biography reminds me of the many hours spent meandering not only through the city streets, or the many and the various literary representations, but also the more general various lines of enquiry, as I considered and reconsidered many approaches, eventually working through to map the literature of the city in my own way. One of the first skills we learn as literary scholars is that of ‘active reading’ as we create our own text almost symbiotically with the primary reading. This document, of me learning about my subject, and how to be a literary scholar, reminds me of the on-going process and evolution of my research methods. Thankfully, the many hours of work which didn’t make the final PhD went on to inform the design of the undergraduate module, ‘Urban Visions’. Positioning the module guide alongside Ackroyd’s text reminds me of the process of a PhD in literature, in that many different thoughts are explored, until a very select and defined approach is finally decided on. Thankfully, rejected work can often find a different life beyond the thesis, and is, after all, a necessary part of the process. Claire Allen, PhD: Beyond Postmodernism: London Fiction at the Millennium",
    author = "Claire Allen",
    year = "2018",
    month = "2",
    day = "16",
    language = "English",

    }

    Textual analysis as a document of research. Allen, Claire (Author). 2018. Event: Without End: Documents of Research, The University of Northampton.

    Research output: Non-textual form typesExhibitionResearch

    TY - ADVS

    T1 - Textual analysis as a document of research

    AU - Allen, Claire

    PY - 2018/2/16

    Y1 - 2018/2/16

    N2 - What are the documents of research in the field of English Literature? Of course the obvious answer is the text, primary or secondary. But whilst contemplating a project such as a PhD how do we, as literary scholars, work through what we will and won’t include and which aspects of the textual analysis become part of the finished project? Peter Ackroyd’s London: The Biography is one of the first texts I was working with at the beginning of my PhD. I remember seeing it in a Waterstones bookstore in Bloomsbury, following one of my first supervisory meetings at the British Library. The process of wondering through the streets and the bookshops of my subject matter somehow felt like part of my research, and at the beginning of the process I thought the writings of Ackroyd was going to be integral. I wrote two draft chapters on his work, but the direction of the thesis changed, and though the London setting remained significant, Ackroyd’s texts, like the streets of the city itself, became more thresholds for wider theoretical engagement, as opposed to subject matter. In the final thesis I refer to Ackroyd seventeen times. Yet, this copy of London: The Biography reminds me of the many hours spent meandering not only through the city streets, or the many and the various literary representations, but also the more general various lines of enquiry, as I considered and reconsidered many approaches, eventually working through to map the literature of the city in my own way. One of the first skills we learn as literary scholars is that of ‘active reading’ as we create our own text almost symbiotically with the primary reading. This document, of me learning about my subject, and how to be a literary scholar, reminds me of the on-going process and evolution of my research methods. Thankfully, the many hours of work which didn’t make the final PhD went on to inform the design of the undergraduate module, ‘Urban Visions’. Positioning the module guide alongside Ackroyd’s text reminds me of the process of a PhD in literature, in that many different thoughts are explored, until a very select and defined approach is finally decided on. Thankfully, rejected work can often find a different life beyond the thesis, and is, after all, a necessary part of the process. Claire Allen, PhD: Beyond Postmodernism: London Fiction at the Millennium

    AB - What are the documents of research in the field of English Literature? Of course the obvious answer is the text, primary or secondary. But whilst contemplating a project such as a PhD how do we, as literary scholars, work through what we will and won’t include and which aspects of the textual analysis become part of the finished project? Peter Ackroyd’s London: The Biography is one of the first texts I was working with at the beginning of my PhD. I remember seeing it in a Waterstones bookstore in Bloomsbury, following one of my first supervisory meetings at the British Library. The process of wondering through the streets and the bookshops of my subject matter somehow felt like part of my research, and at the beginning of the process I thought the writings of Ackroyd was going to be integral. I wrote two draft chapters on his work, but the direction of the thesis changed, and though the London setting remained significant, Ackroyd’s texts, like the streets of the city itself, became more thresholds for wider theoretical engagement, as opposed to subject matter. In the final thesis I refer to Ackroyd seventeen times. Yet, this copy of London: The Biography reminds me of the many hours spent meandering not only through the city streets, or the many and the various literary representations, but also the more general various lines of enquiry, as I considered and reconsidered many approaches, eventually working through to map the literature of the city in my own way. One of the first skills we learn as literary scholars is that of ‘active reading’ as we create our own text almost symbiotically with the primary reading. This document, of me learning about my subject, and how to be a literary scholar, reminds me of the on-going process and evolution of my research methods. Thankfully, the many hours of work which didn’t make the final PhD went on to inform the design of the undergraduate module, ‘Urban Visions’. Positioning the module guide alongside Ackroyd’s text reminds me of the process of a PhD in literature, in that many different thoughts are explored, until a very select and defined approach is finally decided on. Thankfully, rejected work can often find a different life beyond the thesis, and is, after all, a necessary part of the process. Claire Allen, PhD: Beyond Postmodernism: London Fiction at the Millennium

    UR - https://withoutend2018.com/

    M3 - Exhibition

    ER -