The rise and fall in the salience of race equality in higher education

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapterResearch

Abstract

This chapter examines a twenty year period to explore the salience of race equality in higher education. While the dominant policy discourse has periodically drawn attention to the need to combat racial disadvantage, the only serious race equality strategy, following publication of the Macpherson report, was short lived and in the last decade race equality has virtually fallen off the policy agenda. And yet over the same period, research evidence accumulates to demonstrate that BME staff and students continue to experience considerable disadvantage. It is suggested that in the face of such evidence universities are remarkably complacent. Such complacency partly stems from the dominance in the academy and indeed of much of society of a liberal as opposed to radical perspective on equality. Universities typically see themselves as liberal and believe existing policies ensure fairness and in the process ignore adverse outcomes and do not see combating racial inequalities as a priority. This points in my view to the sheer weight of whiteness which will remain intact unless significant pressure is placed on universities to change. The chapter concludes by outlining two ideal typical approaches to the promotion of race equality and suggests that the period has witnessed the transition from an approach close to the first ideal type to an approach close to the second approach. Regardless of which approach is preferred, universities are urged to have no truck with a deficit model and to see it as their responsibility to take action to ensure more equitable outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDismantling race in higher education
Subtitle of host publicationRacism, Whiteness and Decolonising the Academy
EditorsJason Arday, Heidi Mirza
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan Ltd.
Chapter1
Pages27-45
Number of pages18
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-60261-5
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-60260-8
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

equality
education
university
ideal type
fairness
academy
evidence
deficit
promotion
staff
responsibility
discourse
experience
student

Cite this

Pilkington, A. (2018). The rise and fall in the salience of race equality in higher education. In J. Arday, & H. Mirza (Eds.), Dismantling race in higher education: Racism, Whiteness and Decolonising the Academy (1 ed., pp. 27-45). Palgrave Macmillan Ltd..
Pilkington, Andrew. / The rise and fall in the salience of race equality in higher education. Dismantling race in higher education: Racism, Whiteness and Decolonising the Academy. editor / Jason Arday ; Heidi Mirza. 1. ed. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2018. pp. 27-45
@inbook{0561c440ee904c049a7050f5a6a926f5,
title = "The rise and fall in the salience of race equality in higher education",
abstract = "This chapter examines a twenty year period to explore the salience of race equality in higher education. While the dominant policy discourse has periodically drawn attention to the need to combat racial disadvantage, the only serious race equality strategy, following publication of the Macpherson report, was short lived and in the last decade race equality has virtually fallen off the policy agenda. And yet over the same period, research evidence accumulates to demonstrate that BME staff and students continue to experience considerable disadvantage. It is suggested that in the face of such evidence universities are remarkably complacent. Such complacency partly stems from the dominance in the academy and indeed of much of society of a liberal as opposed to radical perspective on equality. Universities typically see themselves as liberal and believe existing policies ensure fairness and in the process ignore adverse outcomes and do not see combating racial inequalities as a priority. This points in my view to the sheer weight of whiteness which will remain intact unless significant pressure is placed on universities to change. The chapter concludes by outlining two ideal typical approaches to the promotion of race equality and suggests that the period has witnessed the transition from an approach close to the first ideal type to an approach close to the second approach. Regardless of which approach is preferred, universities are urged to have no truck with a deficit model and to see it as their responsibility to take action to ensure more equitable outcomes.",
author = "Andrew Pilkington",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "19",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-60260-8",
pages = "27--45",
editor = "Jason Arday and Heidi Mirza",
booktitle = "Dismantling race in higher education",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "1",

}

Pilkington, A 2018, The rise and fall in the salience of race equality in higher education. in J Arday & H Mirza (eds), Dismantling race in higher education: Racism, Whiteness and Decolonising the Academy. 1 edn, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., pp. 27-45.

The rise and fall in the salience of race equality in higher education. / Pilkington, Andrew.

Dismantling race in higher education: Racism, Whiteness and Decolonising the Academy. ed. / Jason Arday; Heidi Mirza. 1. ed. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2018. p. 27-45.

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapterResearch

TY - CHAP

T1 - The rise and fall in the salience of race equality in higher education

AU - Pilkington, Andrew

PY - 2018/9/19

Y1 - 2018/9/19

N2 - This chapter examines a twenty year period to explore the salience of race equality in higher education. While the dominant policy discourse has periodically drawn attention to the need to combat racial disadvantage, the only serious race equality strategy, following publication of the Macpherson report, was short lived and in the last decade race equality has virtually fallen off the policy agenda. And yet over the same period, research evidence accumulates to demonstrate that BME staff and students continue to experience considerable disadvantage. It is suggested that in the face of such evidence universities are remarkably complacent. Such complacency partly stems from the dominance in the academy and indeed of much of society of a liberal as opposed to radical perspective on equality. Universities typically see themselves as liberal and believe existing policies ensure fairness and in the process ignore adverse outcomes and do not see combating racial inequalities as a priority. This points in my view to the sheer weight of whiteness which will remain intact unless significant pressure is placed on universities to change. The chapter concludes by outlining two ideal typical approaches to the promotion of race equality and suggests that the period has witnessed the transition from an approach close to the first ideal type to an approach close to the second approach. Regardless of which approach is preferred, universities are urged to have no truck with a deficit model and to see it as their responsibility to take action to ensure more equitable outcomes.

AB - This chapter examines a twenty year period to explore the salience of race equality in higher education. While the dominant policy discourse has periodically drawn attention to the need to combat racial disadvantage, the only serious race equality strategy, following publication of the Macpherson report, was short lived and in the last decade race equality has virtually fallen off the policy agenda. And yet over the same period, research evidence accumulates to demonstrate that BME staff and students continue to experience considerable disadvantage. It is suggested that in the face of such evidence universities are remarkably complacent. Such complacency partly stems from the dominance in the academy and indeed of much of society of a liberal as opposed to radical perspective on equality. Universities typically see themselves as liberal and believe existing policies ensure fairness and in the process ignore adverse outcomes and do not see combating racial inequalities as a priority. This points in my view to the sheer weight of whiteness which will remain intact unless significant pressure is placed on universities to change. The chapter concludes by outlining two ideal typical approaches to the promotion of race equality and suggests that the period has witnessed the transition from an approach close to the first ideal type to an approach close to the second approach. Regardless of which approach is preferred, universities are urged to have no truck with a deficit model and to see it as their responsibility to take action to ensure more equitable outcomes.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-60260-8

SP - 27

EP - 45

BT - Dismantling race in higher education

A2 - Arday, Jason

A2 - Mirza, Heidi

PB - Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.

ER -

Pilkington A. The rise and fall in the salience of race equality in higher education. In Arday J, Mirza H, editors, Dismantling race in higher education: Racism, Whiteness and Decolonising the Academy. 1 ed. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. 2018. p. 27-45