Abstract
On coming to power in 1997, New Labour continued in the same vein of the previous government by attempting to make criminal justice swifter and more efficient. This chapter analyses how the mechanism of defence disclosure has been cultivated to feed this agenda of increased efficiency of the CJS, often with little regard to pivotal due process safeguards that have been ridden roughshod in pursuit of these goals. It examines the sociopolitical climate that allowed both the creation of a defence disclosure regime via the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 and its subsequent extension into the magistrates’ court via the Criminal Procedure Rules. The chapter examines the inequality between the defence and prosecution disclosure obligations, and their subsequent treatment in court in terms of consequences of non-compliance. It contends that a reversal in procedural culture is needed, in order to restore balance in a system which retains an adversarial architecture.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Law of Disclosure: A Perennial Problem in Criminal Justice |
| Editors | Ed Johnston, Tom Smith |
| Publisher | Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group |
| Chapter | 1 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780367817411 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780367638429 |
| Publication status | Published - 18 Dec 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Publication series
| Name | Contemporary Issues in Criminal Procedure |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Routledge |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Rise of Managerialism: The Impact of Swift and (Un)sure Justice on Disclosure in Criminal Proceedings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver