Abstract
The current study explored the use of ballistic examinations and cross-border information sharing across 14 European countries. The presented data were collected using a mixed methods technique consisting of semi-structured interviews and questionnaires that were completed by participants. The results painted a very heterogeneous picture of the use of automated ballistic systems across these countries, as well as how ballistic analyses are integrated in the fight against gun-enabled crime. Three super-ordinates themes emerged from the thematic analysis: use of automated ballistic systems; ballistic evidence recovery and analysis; knowledge exchange and best practices. The ability to draw firm conclusions regarding the value of ballistics comparison systems, either on a national or cross-border basis, is hampered by inconsistencies regarding data recording practices and definitions. Therefore, key recommendations are suggested to establish better cross border cooperation between member states and develop a better understanding of data sharing procedures.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Science & Justice |
Volume | 57 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 2 May 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 2 May 2017 |
Keywords
- Firearm
- ballistic evidence sharing
- European ballistic database
- open case file
- cross-border comparison