University academics’ perceptions of reading list labels

Gillian Siddall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the results of continuing professional development sessions delivered to academics on the importance of a properly annotated reading list to the student experience. Design/methodology/approach: As part of the session, the academics were asked to take part in a “pop quiz” providing their interpretation of commonly used reading list labels.
Findings: There was quite a broad interpretation of the labels, with several eliciting strongly positive or negative reactions. The similarity of meanings between some reading list labels made them redundant for helping students to prioritise their reading.
Originality/value: This case study could be used to provide sessions on reading lists at other institutions, and the results from the quiz can be used to simplify reading list labels.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)440-448
Number of pages9
JournalNew Library World
Volume117
Issue number7-8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Labels
quiz
Students
interpretation
student
methodology
Values
experience

Keywords

  • Continuing professional development
  • Higher education
  • Reading
  • Reading list
  • Resource list
  • Student experience
  • University

Cite this

Siddall, Gillian. / University academics’ perceptions of reading list labels. In: New Library World. 2016 ; Vol. 117, No. 7-8. pp. 440-448.
@article{4a93898c22584ac08d0b910f1b5c8772,
title = "University academics’ perceptions of reading list labels",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the results of continuing professional development sessions delivered to academics on the importance of a properly annotated reading list to the student experience. Design/methodology/approach: As part of the session, the academics were asked to take part in a “pop quiz” providing their interpretation of commonly used reading list labels. Findings: There was quite a broad interpretation of the labels, with several eliciting strongly positive or negative reactions. The similarity of meanings between some reading list labels made them redundant for helping students to prioritise their reading. Originality/value: This case study could be used to provide sessions on reading lists at other institutions, and the results from the quiz can be used to simplify reading list labels.",
keywords = "Continuing professional development, Higher education, Reading, Reading list, Resource list, Student experience, University",
author = "Gillian Siddall",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/NLW-02-2016-0012",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "440--448",
journal = "Information and Learning Science",
issn = "0307-4803",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "7-8",

}

University academics’ perceptions of reading list labels. / Siddall, Gillian.

In: New Library World, Vol. 117, No. 7-8, 01.07.2016, p. 440-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - University academics’ perceptions of reading list labels

AU - Siddall, Gillian

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the results of continuing professional development sessions delivered to academics on the importance of a properly annotated reading list to the student experience. Design/methodology/approach: As part of the session, the academics were asked to take part in a “pop quiz” providing their interpretation of commonly used reading list labels. Findings: There was quite a broad interpretation of the labels, with several eliciting strongly positive or negative reactions. The similarity of meanings between some reading list labels made them redundant for helping students to prioritise their reading. Originality/value: This case study could be used to provide sessions on reading lists at other institutions, and the results from the quiz can be used to simplify reading list labels.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the results of continuing professional development sessions delivered to academics on the importance of a properly annotated reading list to the student experience. Design/methodology/approach: As part of the session, the academics were asked to take part in a “pop quiz” providing their interpretation of commonly used reading list labels. Findings: There was quite a broad interpretation of the labels, with several eliciting strongly positive or negative reactions. The similarity of meanings between some reading list labels made them redundant for helping students to prioritise their reading. Originality/value: This case study could be used to provide sessions on reading lists at other institutions, and the results from the quiz can be used to simplify reading list labels.

KW - Continuing professional development

KW - Higher education

KW - Reading

KW - Reading list

KW - Resource list

KW - Student experience

KW - University

U2 - 10.1108/NLW-02-2016-0012

DO - 10.1108/NLW-02-2016-0012

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 440

EP - 448

JO - Information and Learning Science

JF - Information and Learning Science

SN - 0307-4803

IS - 7-8

ER -