University academics’ perceptions of reading list labels

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticlepeer-review


Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the results of continuing professional development sessions delivered to academics on the importance of a properly annotated reading list to the student experience. Design/methodology/approach: As part of the session, the academics were asked to take part in a “pop quiz” providing their interpretation of commonly used reading list labels.
Findings: There was quite a broad interpretation of the labels, with several eliciting strongly positive or negative reactions. The similarity of meanings between some reading list labels made them redundant for helping students to prioritise their reading.
Originality/value: This case study could be used to provide sessions on reading lists at other institutions, and the results from the quiz can be used to simplify reading list labels.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)440-448
Number of pages9
JournalNew Library World
Issue number7-8
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016


  • Continuing professional development
  • Higher education
  • Reading
  • Reading list
  • Resource list
  • Student experience
  • University


Dive into the research topics of 'University academics’ perceptions of reading list labels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this