What (else) matters? Policy contexts, emotional geographies

John Horton, Peter Kraftl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this paper we reflect upon a particular, policy-oriented evaluation of a Sure Start Centre: a small element of a UK government programme addressing children’s well-being in ‘deprived’ neighbourhoods. Specifically, and contra some chief social-scientific accounts, we seek to acknowledge how ‘policy’ and ‘emotion’ were inseparable in this project. We suggest that policy and media discourses, and much extant research, regarding Sure Start have been characterised by a particular apprehension of what matters, which constitutes a particular assumption about how policy interventions, in ‘deprived’ neighbourhoods and elsewhere, should be evaluated. In marked contrast we propound qualitative data wherein users of the Sure Start Centre articulated how this facility mattered to them. Our aim is not simply to reiterate a twofold truism: policy is always emotional; emotions are latently political. Rather, we consider how, in the wake of this truism, more combinative, open-minded encounters between bodies of social-scientific endeavours conventionally labelled ‘policy relevant’ vis-à-vis ‘theoretical’ might yield more careful apprehensions of the emotion and affect in policy, and the politics of emotions and affects
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to) 2984-3002
Number of pages18
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume41
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

Fingerprint

emotion
geography
government program
well-being
politics
discourse
evaluation

Keywords

  • Policy
  • Sure Start
  • emotion

Cite this

Horton, John ; Kraftl, Peter. / What (else) matters? Policy contexts, emotional geographies. In: Environment and Planning A. 2009 ; Vol. 41, No. 12. pp. 2984-3002.
@article{8a8c0969504343cab0ec8654232fb86b,
title = "What (else) matters? Policy contexts, emotional geographies",
abstract = "In this paper we reflect upon a particular, policy-oriented evaluation of a Sure Start Centre: a small element of a UK government programme addressing children’s well-being in ‘deprived’ neighbourhoods. Specifically, and contra some chief social-scientific accounts, we seek to acknowledge how ‘policy’ and ‘emotion’ were inseparable in this project. We suggest that policy and media discourses, and much extant research, regarding Sure Start have been characterised by a particular apprehension of what matters, which constitutes a particular assumption about how policy interventions, in ‘deprived’ neighbourhoods and elsewhere, should be evaluated. In marked contrast we propound qualitative data wherein users of the Sure Start Centre articulated how this facility mattered to them. Our aim is not simply to reiterate a twofold truism: policy is always emotional; emotions are latently political. Rather, we consider how, in the wake of this truism, more combinative, open-minded encounters between bodies of social-scientific endeavours conventionally labelled ‘policy relevant’ vis-{\`a}-vis ‘theoretical’ might yield more careful apprehensions of the emotion and affect in policy, and the politics of emotions and affects",
keywords = "Policy, Sure Start, emotion",
author = "John Horton and Peter Kraftl",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1068/a41362",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "2984--3002",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "12",

}

What (else) matters? Policy contexts, emotional geographies. / Horton, John; Kraftl, Peter.

In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 41, No. 12, 01.01.2009, p. 2984-3002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What (else) matters? Policy contexts, emotional geographies

AU - Horton, John

AU - Kraftl, Peter

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - In this paper we reflect upon a particular, policy-oriented evaluation of a Sure Start Centre: a small element of a UK government programme addressing children’s well-being in ‘deprived’ neighbourhoods. Specifically, and contra some chief social-scientific accounts, we seek to acknowledge how ‘policy’ and ‘emotion’ were inseparable in this project. We suggest that policy and media discourses, and much extant research, regarding Sure Start have been characterised by a particular apprehension of what matters, which constitutes a particular assumption about how policy interventions, in ‘deprived’ neighbourhoods and elsewhere, should be evaluated. In marked contrast we propound qualitative data wherein users of the Sure Start Centre articulated how this facility mattered to them. Our aim is not simply to reiterate a twofold truism: policy is always emotional; emotions are latently political. Rather, we consider how, in the wake of this truism, more combinative, open-minded encounters between bodies of social-scientific endeavours conventionally labelled ‘policy relevant’ vis-à-vis ‘theoretical’ might yield more careful apprehensions of the emotion and affect in policy, and the politics of emotions and affects

AB - In this paper we reflect upon a particular, policy-oriented evaluation of a Sure Start Centre: a small element of a UK government programme addressing children’s well-being in ‘deprived’ neighbourhoods. Specifically, and contra some chief social-scientific accounts, we seek to acknowledge how ‘policy’ and ‘emotion’ were inseparable in this project. We suggest that policy and media discourses, and much extant research, regarding Sure Start have been characterised by a particular apprehension of what matters, which constitutes a particular assumption about how policy interventions, in ‘deprived’ neighbourhoods and elsewhere, should be evaluated. In marked contrast we propound qualitative data wherein users of the Sure Start Centre articulated how this facility mattered to them. Our aim is not simply to reiterate a twofold truism: policy is always emotional; emotions are latently political. Rather, we consider how, in the wake of this truism, more combinative, open-minded encounters between bodies of social-scientific endeavours conventionally labelled ‘policy relevant’ vis-à-vis ‘theoretical’ might yield more careful apprehensions of the emotion and affect in policy, and the politics of emotions and affects

KW - Policy

KW - Sure Start

KW - emotion

U2 - 10.1068/a41362

DO - 10.1068/a41362

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 2984

EP - 3002

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 12

ER -