'What the men are crying out for is leadership': the Khartoum Police strike of 1951 and the battle for administrative control

W J Berridge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The British administrative elite in Sudan represented the Khartoum Police Strike of 1951 as a ‘mutiny’, the result of a combination of both outside provocation and of the character failings of both Sudanese policemen and their British officers. This article will demonstrate that these convenient interpretations concealed a series of wider tensions within the colonial state itself, between modernising legal professionals and colonial administrators who cherished their personal control over the police. These tensions dictated debates about the status of the police in the build up to the strike, and the manner in which the heavily politicised enquiry into it was conducted. The Sudan Political Service employed an ‘otherisation’ of Sudanese culture to argue that the country was unsuited for a modern system of policing. Meanwhile, Sudanese policemen and other nationalists attempted to seize from the British the values of ‘civil’ policing that the colonisers preached but rarely practised. Nevertheless, in spite of the identification of the police strikers with other branches of the nationalist and labour movement, their own association with the government ensured that support for the strike was only limited
Original languageEnglish
Article number1
Pages (from-to)121-142
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Imperial and Commonwealth History
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2011

Fingerprint

police
strike
leadership
Sudan
provocation
labor movement
elite
interpretation
Values

Cite this

@article{13b0c19d88514bbfad536cab7b5bdfeb,
title = "'What the men are crying out for is leadership': the Khartoum Police strike of 1951 and the battle for administrative control",
abstract = "The British administrative elite in Sudan represented the Khartoum Police Strike of 1951 as a ‘mutiny’, the result of a combination of both outside provocation and of the character failings of both Sudanese policemen and their British officers. This article will demonstrate that these convenient interpretations concealed a series of wider tensions within the colonial state itself, between modernising legal professionals and colonial administrators who cherished their personal control over the police. These tensions dictated debates about the status of the police in the build up to the strike, and the manner in which the heavily politicised enquiry into it was conducted. The Sudan Political Service employed an ‘otherisation’ of Sudanese culture to argue that the country was unsuited for a modern system of policing. Meanwhile, Sudanese policemen and other nationalists attempted to seize from the British the values of ‘civil’ policing that the colonisers preached but rarely practised. Nevertheless, in spite of the identification of the police strikers with other branches of the nationalist and labour movement, their own association with the government ensured that support for the strike was only limited",
author = "Berridge, {W J}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03086534.2011.543797",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "121--142",
journal = "Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History",
issn = "0308-6534",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

'What the men are crying out for is leadership': the Khartoum Police strike of 1951 and the battle for administrative control. / Berridge, W J.

In: Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, Vol. 39, No. 1, 1, 01.03.2011, p. 121-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'What the men are crying out for is leadership': the Khartoum Police strike of 1951 and the battle for administrative control

AU - Berridge, W J

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - The British administrative elite in Sudan represented the Khartoum Police Strike of 1951 as a ‘mutiny’, the result of a combination of both outside provocation and of the character failings of both Sudanese policemen and their British officers. This article will demonstrate that these convenient interpretations concealed a series of wider tensions within the colonial state itself, between modernising legal professionals and colonial administrators who cherished their personal control over the police. These tensions dictated debates about the status of the police in the build up to the strike, and the manner in which the heavily politicised enquiry into it was conducted. The Sudan Political Service employed an ‘otherisation’ of Sudanese culture to argue that the country was unsuited for a modern system of policing. Meanwhile, Sudanese policemen and other nationalists attempted to seize from the British the values of ‘civil’ policing that the colonisers preached but rarely practised. Nevertheless, in spite of the identification of the police strikers with other branches of the nationalist and labour movement, their own association with the government ensured that support for the strike was only limited

AB - The British administrative elite in Sudan represented the Khartoum Police Strike of 1951 as a ‘mutiny’, the result of a combination of both outside provocation and of the character failings of both Sudanese policemen and their British officers. This article will demonstrate that these convenient interpretations concealed a series of wider tensions within the colonial state itself, between modernising legal professionals and colonial administrators who cherished their personal control over the police. These tensions dictated debates about the status of the police in the build up to the strike, and the manner in which the heavily politicised enquiry into it was conducted. The Sudan Political Service employed an ‘otherisation’ of Sudanese culture to argue that the country was unsuited for a modern system of policing. Meanwhile, Sudanese policemen and other nationalists attempted to seize from the British the values of ‘civil’ policing that the colonisers preached but rarely practised. Nevertheless, in spite of the identification of the police strikers with other branches of the nationalist and labour movement, their own association with the government ensured that support for the strike was only limited

U2 - 10.1080/03086534.2011.543797

DO - 10.1080/03086534.2011.543797

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 121

EP - 142

JO - Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History

JF - Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History

SN - 0308-6534

IS - 1

M1 - 1

ER -