Why researchers compared education internationally 1994 - 2009 and what this tells us about why we do this today

Research output: Contribution to Book/ReportChapter

Abstract

This paper is a systematic literature review into the recent history of international comparative education research. I review the reasons given for comparing education internationally in the fifteen years leading up to 2009, discuss the different types of research conducted and identify patterns in terms of research conducted in different locations. This historical review gives an understanding of the academic and political values of this time and of how they impacted upon researchers motives and methods. It also provides a basis for reflection and understanding into changes in the comparative research discourse in the past five years. I developed a systematic approach to building this paper, using a structured intersecting model with multiple starting points, each of these beginning with a strategically chosen node: a significant journal or institution. I then read and classified the comparative research undertaken, also investigating patterns in the most frequently cited references. Although I am framing this as historical research into the recent past, its intention is also to inform current dialogue by enabling reflection on the changing emphasise found in comparative research and enabling exploration of the broader social, cultural and political context of such changes. The conclusion to the study raises issues for debate regarding the opportunities and challenges of recognising a sense of international collegiality amongst teaching professionals and academics when the nature of comparative research by and into different nations has significant and consistent differences. This is fitting within the conference theme of ‘international development and international dialogue’.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2016 Official Conference Proceedings
Place of PublicationKobe, Japan
PublisherInternational Academic Forum
Pages311-323
Number of pages536
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

comparative research
education
dialogue
comparative education
discourse
Teaching
history

Cite this

Underwood, M. J. (2016). Why researchers compared education internationally 1994 - 2009 and what this tells us about why we do this today. In The Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2016 Official Conference Proceedings (pp. 311-323). Kobe, Japan: International Academic Forum.
Underwood, M James. / Why researchers compared education internationally 1994 - 2009 and what this tells us about why we do this today. The Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2016 Official Conference Proceedings. Kobe, Japan : International Academic Forum, 2016. pp. 311-323
@inbook{04d4eb2e03344ab987b01209e80b983c,
title = "Why researchers compared education internationally 1994 - 2009 and what this tells us about why we do this today",
abstract = "This paper is a systematic literature review into the recent history of international comparative education research. I review the reasons given for comparing education internationally in the fifteen years leading up to 2009, discuss the different types of research conducted and identify patterns in terms of research conducted in different locations. This historical review gives an understanding of the academic and political values of this time and of how they impacted upon researchers motives and methods. It also provides a basis for reflection and understanding into changes in the comparative research discourse in the past five years. I developed a systematic approach to building this paper, using a structured intersecting model with multiple starting points, each of these beginning with a strategically chosen node: a significant journal or institution. I then read and classified the comparative research undertaken, also investigating patterns in the most frequently cited references. Although I am framing this as historical research into the recent past, its intention is also to inform current dialogue by enabling reflection on the changing emphasise found in comparative research and enabling exploration of the broader social, cultural and political context of such changes. The conclusion to the study raises issues for debate regarding the opportunities and challenges of recognising a sense of international collegiality amongst teaching professionals and academics when the nature of comparative research by and into different nations has significant and consistent differences. This is fitting within the conference theme of ‘international development and international dialogue’.",
author = "Underwood, {M James}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "14",
language = "English",
pages = "311--323",
booktitle = "The Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2016 Official Conference Proceedings",
publisher = "International Academic Forum",

}

Underwood, MJ 2016, Why researchers compared education internationally 1994 - 2009 and what this tells us about why we do this today. in The Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2016 Official Conference Proceedings. International Academic Forum, Kobe, Japan, pp. 311-323.

Why researchers compared education internationally 1994 - 2009 and what this tells us about why we do this today. / Underwood, M James.

The Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2016 Official Conference Proceedings. Kobe, Japan : International Academic Forum, 2016. p. 311-323.

Research output: Contribution to Book/ReportChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Why researchers compared education internationally 1994 - 2009 and what this tells us about why we do this today

AU - Underwood, M James

PY - 2016/6/14

Y1 - 2016/6/14

N2 - This paper is a systematic literature review into the recent history of international comparative education research. I review the reasons given for comparing education internationally in the fifteen years leading up to 2009, discuss the different types of research conducted and identify patterns in terms of research conducted in different locations. This historical review gives an understanding of the academic and political values of this time and of how they impacted upon researchers motives and methods. It also provides a basis for reflection and understanding into changes in the comparative research discourse in the past five years. I developed a systematic approach to building this paper, using a structured intersecting model with multiple starting points, each of these beginning with a strategically chosen node: a significant journal or institution. I then read and classified the comparative research undertaken, also investigating patterns in the most frequently cited references. Although I am framing this as historical research into the recent past, its intention is also to inform current dialogue by enabling reflection on the changing emphasise found in comparative research and enabling exploration of the broader social, cultural and political context of such changes. The conclusion to the study raises issues for debate regarding the opportunities and challenges of recognising a sense of international collegiality amongst teaching professionals and academics when the nature of comparative research by and into different nations has significant and consistent differences. This is fitting within the conference theme of ‘international development and international dialogue’.

AB - This paper is a systematic literature review into the recent history of international comparative education research. I review the reasons given for comparing education internationally in the fifteen years leading up to 2009, discuss the different types of research conducted and identify patterns in terms of research conducted in different locations. This historical review gives an understanding of the academic and political values of this time and of how they impacted upon researchers motives and methods. It also provides a basis for reflection and understanding into changes in the comparative research discourse in the past five years. I developed a systematic approach to building this paper, using a structured intersecting model with multiple starting points, each of these beginning with a strategically chosen node: a significant journal or institution. I then read and classified the comparative research undertaken, also investigating patterns in the most frequently cited references. Although I am framing this as historical research into the recent past, its intention is also to inform current dialogue by enabling reflection on the changing emphasise found in comparative research and enabling exploration of the broader social, cultural and political context of such changes. The conclusion to the study raises issues for debate regarding the opportunities and challenges of recognising a sense of international collegiality amongst teaching professionals and academics when the nature of comparative research by and into different nations has significant and consistent differences. This is fitting within the conference theme of ‘international development and international dialogue’.

M3 - Chapter

SP - 311

EP - 323

BT - The Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2016 Official Conference Proceedings

PB - International Academic Forum

CY - Kobe, Japan

ER -

Underwood MJ. Why researchers compared education internationally 1994 - 2009 and what this tells us about why we do this today. In The Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2016 Official Conference Proceedings. Kobe, Japan: International Academic Forum. 2016. p. 311-323