The impact of rapport on intelligence yield: police source handler telephone interactions with covert human intelligence source

Jordan Nunan*, Ian Stanier, Rebecca Milne, Andrea Mary Shawyer, David Walsh, Brandon May

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS) provide unique access to criminals and organised crime groups, and their collection of intelligence is vital to understanding England and Wales’ threat picture. Rapport is essential to the establishment and maintenance of effective professional relationships between source handlers and their CHIS. Thus, rapport-based interviewing is a fundamental factor to maximising intelligence yield. The present research gained unprecedented access to 105 real-life audio recorded telephone interactions between England and Wales police source handlers and CHIS. This research quantified both the rapport component behaviours (e.g., attention, positivity, and coordination) displayed by the source handler and the intelligence yielded from the CHIS, in order to investigate the frequencies of these rapport components and their relationship to intelligence yield. Overall rapport, attention and coordination significantly correlated with intelligence yield, while positivity did not. Attention was the most frequently used component of rapport, followed by positivity, and then coordination.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
Volume29
Issue number1
Early online date30 Jul 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

©2020 The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Covert Human Intelligence Source
  • Human Intelligence
  • HUMINT
  • Intellgience
  • Interviewing
  • Rapport
  • Source Handler

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of rapport on intelligence yield: police source handler telephone interactions with covert human intelligence source'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this