‘Through the back door': Defence perspectives on the rise of managerialism at the expense of adversarial justice

Ed Johnston*, Thomas Smith

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to Book/ReportChapter

Abstract

This chapter charts the evolution of managerialism in England and Wales through the lens of defence lawyers. Drawn from two PhD studies, the chapter advances empirical evidence of the implicit rise of managerialism in England and Wales. The chapter argues that the role of the defence lawyer needs to be reconceived from that as a zealous advocate. The genesis of this re-conception was the disclosure obligations under the CPIA 1996 and was extended further by the CrimPR 2003. The chapter draws conclusions regarding the re-aligned role of defence lawyers in England and Wales and argues that the defence lawyer in the modern era diverges from classic ideas of adversarialism. It will be argued that the findings indicate a major, largely unheralded, and (possibly) permanent departure from traditional adversarial values in criminal defence, values which were previously considered to underpin equality of arms and fair trials.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEfficiency and Bureaucratisation of Criminal Justice: Global Trends
EditorsEd Johnston, Anna Pivaty
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Chapter5
Pages88-108
Number of pages20
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781003207818
ISBN (Print)1032075856
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Feb 2023

Publication series

NameContemporary Issues in Criminal Justice and Procedure

Keywords

  • mangerialism
  • Adversarialism
  • defence lawyer
  • fair trial rights
  • due process

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Through the back door': Defence perspectives on the rise of managerialism at the expense of adversarial justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this