Bolshevising the Army? Lord Gorell and Army Education, 1918-1920

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

On 15 June 1920 a Royal Warrant was issued stating that the monarch ‘deem[ed] it expedient to authorize the formation of a Corps to be entitled “Army Educational Corps”’.1 Histories of army education usually present this as the culmination of the efforts of a pioneering individual, Ronald Barnes, Third Lord Gorell. In these narratives he overcomes various bureaucratic barriers to provide the army with a modern, liberal education for its rank and file, only for his Army Educational Corps (AEC) to be hobbled by a conservative and hostile military establishment. Gorell summed up this interpretation when he described in his memoirs how the opposition to his work had been led by the Adjutant-General who ‘publicly accused me of “bolshevising the Army”’.2 Although this article does not challenge the fundamental centrality of Gorell to the establishment of the AEC, it will suggest that his contribution was not wholly positive and that the significance of reactionary opposition to his work has been overplayed. Ninety years on, the foundation myth of
army education perhaps needs a more balanced view of its hero.
Original languageEnglish
Article number354
Pages (from-to)170-198
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of the Society for Army Historical Research
Volume88
Issue number354
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Education
Army
Corps
History
Centrality
Hero
Liberal Education
Monarch
Fundamental
File
Warrants
Reactionary
Military
Memoir
Foundation Myth

Cite this

@article{a8671e999def454caa76f272d01b15ee,
title = "Bolshevising the Army? Lord Gorell and Army Education, 1918-1920",
abstract = "On 15 June 1920 a Royal Warrant was issued stating that the monarch ‘deem[ed] it expedient to authorize the formation of a Corps to be entitled “Army Educational Corps”’.1 Histories of army education usually present this as the culmination of the efforts of a pioneering individual, Ronald Barnes, Third Lord Gorell. In these narratives he overcomes various bureaucratic barriers to provide the army with a modern, liberal education for its rank and file, only for his Army Educational Corps (AEC) to be hobbled by a conservative and hostile military establishment. Gorell summed up this interpretation when he described in his memoirs how the opposition to his work had been led by the Adjutant-General who ‘publicly accused me of “bolshevising the Army”’.2 Although this article does not challenge the fundamental centrality of Gorell to the establishment of the AEC, it will suggest that his contribution was not wholly positive and that the significance of reactionary opposition to his work has been overplayed. Ninety years on, the foundation myth ofarmy education perhaps needs a more balanced view of its hero.",
author = "Jim Beach",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "170--198",
journal = "Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research",
issn = "0037-9700",
number = "354",

}

Bolshevising the Army? Lord Gorell and Army Education, 1918-1920. / Beach, Jim.

In: Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research, Vol. 88, No. 354, 354, 01.06.2010, p. 170-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bolshevising the Army? Lord Gorell and Army Education, 1918-1920

AU - Beach, Jim

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - On 15 June 1920 a Royal Warrant was issued stating that the monarch ‘deem[ed] it expedient to authorize the formation of a Corps to be entitled “Army Educational Corps”’.1 Histories of army education usually present this as the culmination of the efforts of a pioneering individual, Ronald Barnes, Third Lord Gorell. In these narratives he overcomes various bureaucratic barriers to provide the army with a modern, liberal education for its rank and file, only for his Army Educational Corps (AEC) to be hobbled by a conservative and hostile military establishment. Gorell summed up this interpretation when he described in his memoirs how the opposition to his work had been led by the Adjutant-General who ‘publicly accused me of “bolshevising the Army”’.2 Although this article does not challenge the fundamental centrality of Gorell to the establishment of the AEC, it will suggest that his contribution was not wholly positive and that the significance of reactionary opposition to his work has been overplayed. Ninety years on, the foundation myth ofarmy education perhaps needs a more balanced view of its hero.

AB - On 15 June 1920 a Royal Warrant was issued stating that the monarch ‘deem[ed] it expedient to authorize the formation of a Corps to be entitled “Army Educational Corps”’.1 Histories of army education usually present this as the culmination of the efforts of a pioneering individual, Ronald Barnes, Third Lord Gorell. In these narratives he overcomes various bureaucratic barriers to provide the army with a modern, liberal education for its rank and file, only for his Army Educational Corps (AEC) to be hobbled by a conservative and hostile military establishment. Gorell summed up this interpretation when he described in his memoirs how the opposition to his work had been led by the Adjutant-General who ‘publicly accused me of “bolshevising the Army”’.2 Although this article does not challenge the fundamental centrality of Gorell to the establishment of the AEC, it will suggest that his contribution was not wholly positive and that the significance of reactionary opposition to his work has been overplayed. Ninety years on, the foundation myth ofarmy education perhaps needs a more balanced view of its hero.

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 170

EP - 198

JO - Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research

JF - Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research

SN - 0037-9700

IS - 354

M1 - 354

ER -