Boots, material culture and Georgian masculinities

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Writings on footwear tend to emphasise a fundamental division between those made for men and women: men’s are plain, sturdy and functional, whereas women’s are decorative, flimsy and impractical. Of all male footwear, boots are typically the plainest, sturdiest and most functional of all. In the eighteenth century they were emphatically outdoor wear, and scholars have noted their rustic and unrefined image. This article re-evaluates the elite male boot of the long eighteenth century in Britain, emphasising its complex symbolic associations and its significance for the gendered lives of men. Boots were associated with equestrianism, social status and the military, and therefore were key markers of gender, class and national identities. Furthermore, the article considers boots as material objects, and what this tells us about their use and the impact that they had upon the bodies of their wearers. Based on research in three key shoe archives, this study uses boots to think about Georgian notions of masculinity, the body and the self.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalSocial History
    Volume42
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Sep 2017

    Fingerprint

    Material Culture
    Masculinity
    Boot
    Footwear
    Material Objects
    National Identity
    Military
    Social Status
    Elites
    Shoes
    Fundamental

    Keywords

    • Boots
    • shoes
    • masculinity
    • body
    • Britain

    Cite this

    @article{a3aef0fb683642688aff5c97d3d5f019,
    title = "Boots, material culture and Georgian masculinities",
    abstract = "Writings on footwear tend to emphasise a fundamental division between those made for men and women: men’s are plain, sturdy and functional, whereas women’s are decorative, flimsy and impractical. Of all male footwear, boots are typically the plainest, sturdiest and most functional of all. In the eighteenth century they were emphatically outdoor wear, and scholars have noted their rustic and unrefined image. This article re-evaluates the elite male boot of the long eighteenth century in Britain, emphasising its complex symbolic associations and its significance for the gendered lives of men. Boots were associated with equestrianism, social status and the military, and therefore were key markers of gender, class and national identities. Furthermore, the article considers boots as material objects, and what this tells us about their use and the impact that they had upon the bodies of their wearers. Based on research in three key shoe archives, this study uses boots to think about Georgian notions of masculinity, the body and the self.",
    keywords = "Boots, shoes, masculinity, body, Britain",
    author = "Matthew McCormack",
    year = "2017",
    month = "9",
    day = "28",
    doi = "10.1080/03071022.2017.1368231",
    language = "English",
    volume = "42",
    journal = "Social History",
    issn = "0307-1022",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "4",

    }

    Boots, material culture and Georgian masculinities. / McCormack, Matthew.

    In: Social History, Vol. 42, No. 4, 28.09.2017.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Boots, material culture and Georgian masculinities

    AU - McCormack, Matthew

    PY - 2017/9/28

    Y1 - 2017/9/28

    N2 - Writings on footwear tend to emphasise a fundamental division between those made for men and women: men’s are plain, sturdy and functional, whereas women’s are decorative, flimsy and impractical. Of all male footwear, boots are typically the plainest, sturdiest and most functional of all. In the eighteenth century they were emphatically outdoor wear, and scholars have noted their rustic and unrefined image. This article re-evaluates the elite male boot of the long eighteenth century in Britain, emphasising its complex symbolic associations and its significance for the gendered lives of men. Boots were associated with equestrianism, social status and the military, and therefore were key markers of gender, class and national identities. Furthermore, the article considers boots as material objects, and what this tells us about their use and the impact that they had upon the bodies of their wearers. Based on research in three key shoe archives, this study uses boots to think about Georgian notions of masculinity, the body and the self.

    AB - Writings on footwear tend to emphasise a fundamental division between those made for men and women: men’s are plain, sturdy and functional, whereas women’s are decorative, flimsy and impractical. Of all male footwear, boots are typically the plainest, sturdiest and most functional of all. In the eighteenth century they were emphatically outdoor wear, and scholars have noted their rustic and unrefined image. This article re-evaluates the elite male boot of the long eighteenth century in Britain, emphasising its complex symbolic associations and its significance for the gendered lives of men. Boots were associated with equestrianism, social status and the military, and therefore were key markers of gender, class and national identities. Furthermore, the article considers boots as material objects, and what this tells us about their use and the impact that they had upon the bodies of their wearers. Based on research in three key shoe archives, this study uses boots to think about Georgian notions of masculinity, the body and the self.

    KW - Boots

    KW - shoes

    KW - masculinity

    KW - body

    KW - Britain

    U2 - 10.1080/03071022.2017.1368231

    DO - 10.1080/03071022.2017.1368231

    M3 - Article

    VL - 42

    JO - Social History

    JF - Social History

    SN - 0307-1022

    IS - 4

    ER -