Boots, material culture and Georgian masculinities

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticle

Abstract

Writings on footwear tend to emphasise a fundamental division between those made for men and women: men’s are plain, sturdy and functional, whereas women’s are decorative, flimsy and impractical. Of all male footwear, boots are typically the plainest, sturdiest and most functional of all. In the eighteenth century they were emphatically outdoor wear, and scholars have noted their rustic and unrefined image. This article re-evaluates the elite male boot of the long eighteenth century in Britain, emphasising its complex symbolic associations and its significance for the gendered lives of men. Boots were associated with equestrianism, social status and the military, and therefore were key markers of gender, class and national identities. Furthermore, the article considers boots as material objects, and what this tells us about their use and the impact that they had upon the bodies of their wearers. Based on research in three key shoe archives, this study uses boots to think about Georgian notions of masculinity, the body and the self.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSocial History
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Material Culture
Masculinity
Boot
Footwear
Material Objects
National Identity
Military
Social Status
Elites
Shoes
Fundamental

Keywords

  • Boots
  • shoes
  • masculinity
  • body
  • Britain

Cite this

@article{a3aef0fb683642688aff5c97d3d5f019,
title = "Boots, material culture and Georgian masculinities",
abstract = "Writings on footwear tend to emphasise a fundamental division between those made for men and women: men’s are plain, sturdy and functional, whereas women’s are decorative, flimsy and impractical. Of all male footwear, boots are typically the plainest, sturdiest and most functional of all. In the eighteenth century they were emphatically outdoor wear, and scholars have noted their rustic and unrefined image. This article re-evaluates the elite male boot of the long eighteenth century in Britain, emphasising its complex symbolic associations and its significance for the gendered lives of men. Boots were associated with equestrianism, social status and the military, and therefore were key markers of gender, class and national identities. Furthermore, the article considers boots as material objects, and what this tells us about their use and the impact that they had upon the bodies of their wearers. Based on research in three key shoe archives, this study uses boots to think about Georgian notions of masculinity, the body and the self.",
keywords = "Boots, shoes, masculinity, body, Britain",
author = "Matthew McCormack",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/03071022.2017.1368231",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
journal = "Social History",
issn = "0307-1022",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

Boots, material culture and Georgian masculinities. / McCormack, Matthew.

In: Social History, Vol. 42, No. 4, 28.09.2017.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Boots, material culture and Georgian masculinities

AU - McCormack, Matthew

PY - 2017/9/28

Y1 - 2017/9/28

N2 - Writings on footwear tend to emphasise a fundamental division between those made for men and women: men’s are plain, sturdy and functional, whereas women’s are decorative, flimsy and impractical. Of all male footwear, boots are typically the plainest, sturdiest and most functional of all. In the eighteenth century they were emphatically outdoor wear, and scholars have noted their rustic and unrefined image. This article re-evaluates the elite male boot of the long eighteenth century in Britain, emphasising its complex symbolic associations and its significance for the gendered lives of men. Boots were associated with equestrianism, social status and the military, and therefore were key markers of gender, class and national identities. Furthermore, the article considers boots as material objects, and what this tells us about their use and the impact that they had upon the bodies of their wearers. Based on research in three key shoe archives, this study uses boots to think about Georgian notions of masculinity, the body and the self.

AB - Writings on footwear tend to emphasise a fundamental division between those made for men and women: men’s are plain, sturdy and functional, whereas women’s are decorative, flimsy and impractical. Of all male footwear, boots are typically the plainest, sturdiest and most functional of all. In the eighteenth century they were emphatically outdoor wear, and scholars have noted their rustic and unrefined image. This article re-evaluates the elite male boot of the long eighteenth century in Britain, emphasising its complex symbolic associations and its significance for the gendered lives of men. Boots were associated with equestrianism, social status and the military, and therefore were key markers of gender, class and national identities. Furthermore, the article considers boots as material objects, and what this tells us about their use and the impact that they had upon the bodies of their wearers. Based on research in three key shoe archives, this study uses boots to think about Georgian notions of masculinity, the body and the self.

KW - Boots

KW - shoes

KW - masculinity

KW - body

KW - Britain

U2 - 10.1080/03071022.2017.1368231

DO - 10.1080/03071022.2017.1368231

M3 - Article

VL - 42

JO - Social History

JF - Social History

SN - 0307-1022

IS - 4

ER -