Classroom support: Using classroom support in a primary school: A single school case study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction The efficient use of classroom support in managing pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools has been a topic of considerable debate in recent years. For many writers the role of LSAs has been seen as a critical factor in enabling pupils with special educational needs to be included in mainstream classrooms (Giangreco, 1996; 1997; Giangreco, Whiteford, Whiteford & Doyle, 1998; Wood, 1998). There have, however, been relatively few investigations undertaken into the most effective use of classroom support or its impact upon learning. Farrell (1997) recognised that the role played by LSAs could be an important factor in enabling classroom participation. However, he emphasises the need to become more precise in defining responsibilities in order to ensure that pupils are actually included, rather than treated separately from their peers. Booth, Ainscow and Dyson (1997) suggest that whilst providing classroom support may at times be critical in enabling pupils with special educational needs to participate in lessons, there are occasions when intervention may have a detrimental effect through a reduction of opportunities for interaction with other pupils or the class teacher. They would endorse Farrell's opinion that a more carefully defined role for LSAs than is currently seen in many schools, needs to be established. The teacher and learning support assistant relationship is clearly a complex one. The presence of additional staff in a classroom cannot automatically guarantee that a pupil with special educational needs will be included and it is necessary to ask critical questions regarding the role of LSAs and their effectiveness in promoting inclusion. Balshaw (1999) has provided guidelines on ways in which schools may become more incisive in developing classroom teams to provide support for pupils with special educational needs. Her rationale for team building and the deployment of staff enables schools to identify the means of developing practices, which avoid many of the potential pitfalls highlighted by Booth et al (1997) and Farrell (1997). However, there remains a need for a more empirical approach to defining what works in the classroom.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-196
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal Of Special Education
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

primary school
special educational needs
pupil
classroom
school
staff
teacher
assistant
learning
guarantee
writer
inclusion
responsibility
participation
interaction

Cite this

@article{1690c7743df14845a7745a906bac226d,
title = "Classroom support: Using classroom support in a primary school: A single school case study",
abstract = "Introduction The efficient use of classroom support in managing pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools has been a topic of considerable debate in recent years. For many writers the role of LSAs has been seen as a critical factor in enabling pupils with special educational needs to be included in mainstream classrooms (Giangreco, 1996; 1997; Giangreco, Whiteford, Whiteford & Doyle, 1998; Wood, 1998). There have, however, been relatively few investigations undertaken into the most effective use of classroom support or its impact upon learning. Farrell (1997) recognised that the role played by LSAs could be an important factor in enabling classroom participation. However, he emphasises the need to become more precise in defining responsibilities in order to ensure that pupils are actually included, rather than treated separately from their peers. Booth, Ainscow and Dyson (1997) suggest that whilst providing classroom support may at times be critical in enabling pupils with special educational needs to participate in lessons, there are occasions when intervention may have a detrimental effect through a reduction of opportunities for interaction with other pupils or the class teacher. They would endorse Farrell's opinion that a more carefully defined role for LSAs than is currently seen in many schools, needs to be established. The teacher and learning support assistant relationship is clearly a complex one. The presence of additional staff in a classroom cannot automatically guarantee that a pupil with special educational needs will be included and it is necessary to ask critical questions regarding the role of LSAs and their effectiveness in promoting inclusion. Balshaw (1999) has provided guidelines on ways in which schools may become more incisive in developing classroom teams to provide support for pupils with special educational needs. Her rationale for team building and the deployment of staff enables schools to identify the means of developing practices, which avoid many of the potential pitfalls highlighted by Booth et al (1997) and Farrell (1997). However, there remains a need for a more empirical approach to defining what works in the classroom.",
author = "Richard Rose",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8527.00188",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "191--196",
journal = "British Journal Of Special Education",
issn = "1467-8578",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "4",

}

Classroom support: Using classroom support in a primary school: A single school case study. / Rose, Richard.

In: British Journal Of Special Education, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2000, p. 191-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classroom support: Using classroom support in a primary school: A single school case study

AU - Rose, Richard

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Introduction The efficient use of classroom support in managing pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools has been a topic of considerable debate in recent years. For many writers the role of LSAs has been seen as a critical factor in enabling pupils with special educational needs to be included in mainstream classrooms (Giangreco, 1996; 1997; Giangreco, Whiteford, Whiteford & Doyle, 1998; Wood, 1998). There have, however, been relatively few investigations undertaken into the most effective use of classroom support or its impact upon learning. Farrell (1997) recognised that the role played by LSAs could be an important factor in enabling classroom participation. However, he emphasises the need to become more precise in defining responsibilities in order to ensure that pupils are actually included, rather than treated separately from their peers. Booth, Ainscow and Dyson (1997) suggest that whilst providing classroom support may at times be critical in enabling pupils with special educational needs to participate in lessons, there are occasions when intervention may have a detrimental effect through a reduction of opportunities for interaction with other pupils or the class teacher. They would endorse Farrell's opinion that a more carefully defined role for LSAs than is currently seen in many schools, needs to be established. The teacher and learning support assistant relationship is clearly a complex one. The presence of additional staff in a classroom cannot automatically guarantee that a pupil with special educational needs will be included and it is necessary to ask critical questions regarding the role of LSAs and their effectiveness in promoting inclusion. Balshaw (1999) has provided guidelines on ways in which schools may become more incisive in developing classroom teams to provide support for pupils with special educational needs. Her rationale for team building and the deployment of staff enables schools to identify the means of developing practices, which avoid many of the potential pitfalls highlighted by Booth et al (1997) and Farrell (1997). However, there remains a need for a more empirical approach to defining what works in the classroom.

AB - Introduction The efficient use of classroom support in managing pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools has been a topic of considerable debate in recent years. For many writers the role of LSAs has been seen as a critical factor in enabling pupils with special educational needs to be included in mainstream classrooms (Giangreco, 1996; 1997; Giangreco, Whiteford, Whiteford & Doyle, 1998; Wood, 1998). There have, however, been relatively few investigations undertaken into the most effective use of classroom support or its impact upon learning. Farrell (1997) recognised that the role played by LSAs could be an important factor in enabling classroom participation. However, he emphasises the need to become more precise in defining responsibilities in order to ensure that pupils are actually included, rather than treated separately from their peers. Booth, Ainscow and Dyson (1997) suggest that whilst providing classroom support may at times be critical in enabling pupils with special educational needs to participate in lessons, there are occasions when intervention may have a detrimental effect through a reduction of opportunities for interaction with other pupils or the class teacher. They would endorse Farrell's opinion that a more carefully defined role for LSAs than is currently seen in many schools, needs to be established. The teacher and learning support assistant relationship is clearly a complex one. The presence of additional staff in a classroom cannot automatically guarantee that a pupil with special educational needs will be included and it is necessary to ask critical questions regarding the role of LSAs and their effectiveness in promoting inclusion. Balshaw (1999) has provided guidelines on ways in which schools may become more incisive in developing classroom teams to provide support for pupils with special educational needs. Her rationale for team building and the deployment of staff enables schools to identify the means of developing practices, which avoid many of the potential pitfalls highlighted by Booth et al (1997) and Farrell (1997). However, there remains a need for a more empirical approach to defining what works in the classroom.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/classroom-support-using-classroom-support-primary-school-single-school-case-study

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8527.00188

DO - 10.1111/1467-8527.00188

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 191

EP - 196

JO - British Journal Of Special Education

JF - British Journal Of Special Education

SN - 1467-8578

IS - 4

ER -