TY - CHAP
T1 - Construction Innovation
AU - Kärnä, Sami
AU - Sorvala, Veli-Matti
AU - Junnonen, Juha-Matti
AU - Lindahl, Göran
AU - Ryd, Nina
AU - Hebert, Paulette R
AU - Chaney, Sylvia
AU - Leifer, D.
AU - Holt, Robin
AU - Rowe, David
AU - Walker, Derek H.T.
AU - Keniger, Michael
AU - Kajonius, Petri
AU - Leung, Mei‐yung
AU - Liu, Anita M.M.
AU - Ng, S. Thomas
AU - Al-Reshaid, Khaled
AU - Kartam, Nabil
AU - Tewari, Narendra
AU - Al-Bader, Haya
AU - E., Manowong
AU - S.O., Ogunlana
AU - Othman, Ahmad Anuar
AU - Torrance, Johan Victor
AU - Hamid, Munshi Ab.
AU - Widén, Kristian
AU - Toor, Shamas-ur-Rehman
AU - Ogunlana, Stephen O.
AU - Kärnä, Sami
AU - Junnonen, Juha-Matti
AU - Sorvala, Veli-Matti
AU - Halkos, George
AU - Bousinakis, Dimitrios
AU - Nzekwe-Excel, Chinny
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Purpose – This study aims to focus on the use of a survey questionnaire to inform a sustainable lighting design modification of an existing university library on the campus of a large land-grant university in the Mid-Western USA and also aims to suggest that a similar methodology may be useful in other facilities' design applications. Design/methodology/approach – A 40-item questionnaire was developed, which sought to evaluate the effect of the existing lighting design on end-users' perceptions and opinions at the university library and to gather general opinions regarding sustainability from library end-users. The self-administered survey asked respondents how much they agreed or disagreed (on a five-point, Likert-type scale) with a set of statements about sustainability, their use of the library, and their understanding of and reaction to its existing illumination. Findings – A total of 183 respondents completed and returned questionnaires, the majority of whom indicated that they were undergraduate students enrolled at the university. The survey results indicate that the respondents were aware of sustainability and sustainable lighting; that they were dissatisfied with the library's existing lighting; and that they suggested that these issues be addressed by the university to reduce the library's environmental footprint. Research limitations/implications – The study fills a gap in the literature since it documents the application of citizen participation theory to solicit input from stakeholders in an institutional setting to influence facility design. However, the research is limited by the fact that the sample comprised mostly of female undergraduate students. Originality/value – End-users influenced the design development of a university library's lighting renovation. This renovation is ultimately anticipated to lower the energy consumed to illuminate the facility, to increase the end-users' perceptions of the facility's sustainability, to meet new university guidelines, and to reduce the facility's environmental impact. There are potential applications for the procedures described herein for other facilities in the integration of stakeholders in renovation projects. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]; Copyright of Facilities is the property of Emerald Group Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
AB - Purpose – This study aims to focus on the use of a survey questionnaire to inform a sustainable lighting design modification of an existing university library on the campus of a large land-grant university in the Mid-Western USA and also aims to suggest that a similar methodology may be useful in other facilities' design applications. Design/methodology/approach – A 40-item questionnaire was developed, which sought to evaluate the effect of the existing lighting design on end-users' perceptions and opinions at the university library and to gather general opinions regarding sustainability from library end-users. The self-administered survey asked respondents how much they agreed or disagreed (on a five-point, Likert-type scale) with a set of statements about sustainability, their use of the library, and their understanding of and reaction to its existing illumination. Findings – A total of 183 respondents completed and returned questionnaires, the majority of whom indicated that they were undergraduate students enrolled at the university. The survey results indicate that the respondents were aware of sustainability and sustainable lighting; that they were dissatisfied with the library's existing lighting; and that they suggested that these issues be addressed by the university to reduce the library's environmental footprint. Research limitations/implications – The study fills a gap in the literature since it documents the application of citizen participation theory to solicit input from stakeholders in an institutional setting to influence facility design. However, the research is limited by the fact that the sample comprised mostly of female undergraduate students. Originality/value – End-users influenced the design development of a university library's lighting renovation. This renovation is ultimately anticipated to lower the energy consumed to illuminate the facility, to increase the end-users' perceptions of the facility's sustainability, to meet new university guidelines, and to reduce the facility's environmental impact. There are potential applications for the procedures described herein for other facilities in the integration of stakeholders in renovation projects. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]; Copyright of Facilities is the property of Emerald Group Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
KW - Citizen participation
KW - Construction industry
KW - Design and development
KW - Evaluation
KW - Industrial management
KW - Leadership
KW - Project management
KW - Pu
KW - Public policy
KW - Public sector
KW - TQM
KW - United Kingdom
KW - client
KW - construction industry
KW - customer relations
KW - customer satisfaction
KW - customer services quality
KW - factor analysis
KW - greece
KW - job satisfaction
KW - leadership
KW - library buildings
KW - library facilities
KW - lighting
KW - paper type research paper
KW - participant
KW - performance measures
KW - productivity rate
KW - project teams
KW - public sector
KW - satisfaction assessment
KW - stakeholders
KW - stress
KW - survey
KW - sustainability
KW - team working
KW - tqm
KW - united kingdom
UR - http://gateway.library.qut.edu.au/login?url=http://proquest.umi.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/pqdweb?did=1143418501&Fmt=2&clientId=14394&RQT=309&VName=PQD
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33746337278&partnerID=40&md5=7b971bfb13aba67a0c2d4
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/construction-innovation-1
U2 - 10.1108/02632779810211812
DO - 10.1108/02632779810211812
M3 - Chapter
C2 - 801615976
SN - 0969-9988
T3 - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
SP - 149
EP - 167
BT - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
PB - Unknown Publisher
ER -