Abstract
This article reflects on the current paucity of academic research into the Whitechapel Murders of 1888. Notably it suggests that there has been a tendency for historians of crime in particular to ignore the case and it argues that this has created an unwanted vacuum that has been filled (and exploited) by amateur history and the entertainment industry. This has consequences for how the public view both the murders and the killer, and the entire late Victorian period. The cultural phenomenon of ‘Jack the Ripper’ has been allowed to emerge as a result of this lack of academic engagement and this fuels an industry that continues to portray the murderer, the murdered and the area in which these killings occurred in a manner that does a terrible and ongoing disservice to the women that were so brutally killed. Moreover, the ‘celebration’ of the unknown killer has provided a role model for subsequent misogynist serial murderers and abusers. This article argues that it is time for historians of crime address this situation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 2 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Humanities |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 23 May 2018 |
Keywords
- Jack the Ripper
- Crime History
- History
- Public History
- Mythology
- Ripperology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exorcising a demon?: Why History needs to engage with the Whitechapel Murders and dispel the myth of ‘Jack the Ripper’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Dr Drew Gray
- University of Northampton, Culture - Head of Culture
- Centre for Historical Studies
Person: Academic