Abstract
Introduction: Impact is a key concept in all aspects of research and development activity. The extent to which it is effectively identified can affect research activity at all levels: from whether an individual project is funded, to the funding granted to – and the reputations of – entire institutions. Funding for research and other activity supporting education and social inclusion is limited and highly contested. It is therefore imperative that impact is effectively identified.
Objective: The Erasmus+ National Agencies’ Impact+ tool was developed to help projects identify impact in four domains: systemic impact, impact regarding target groups, impact to partner organisations and impact to project personnel. This paper discusses this tool’s adaptation to identify impact in a three-year transnational project where a partnership of universities, schools, non-governmental organisations and small enterprises developed, provided and evaluated parent education in autism in three south-east European countries.
Method: A semi-structured questionnaire was completed by personnel from partner organisations within the project (n=16). Findings regarding the four domains of impact are presented, and differences of response within the partnership are discussed.
Conclusion: It is suggested that this tool is helpful in supporting a broader conceptualisation of impact, and has wider utility.
Objective: The Erasmus+ National Agencies’ Impact+ tool was developed to help projects identify impact in four domains: systemic impact, impact regarding target groups, impact to partner organisations and impact to project personnel. This paper discusses this tool’s adaptation to identify impact in a three-year transnational project where a partnership of universities, schools, non-governmental organisations and small enterprises developed, provided and evaluated parent education in autism in three south-east European countries.
Method: A semi-structured questionnaire was completed by personnel from partner organisations within the project (n=16). Findings regarding the four domains of impact are presented, and differences of response within the partnership are discussed.
Conclusion: It is suggested that this tool is helpful in supporting a broader conceptualisation of impact, and has wider utility.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 4-13 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 28 Feb 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 5 Jul 2020 |
Keywords
- research impact
- research assessment
- Erasmus+
- Impact+