Nightmare in red: Twin Peaks parody, homage and mashup

Lorna Jowett, Jeffrey Weinstock (Editor), Catherine Spooner (Editor)

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapterResearch

Abstract

In Fan Phenomena: Twin Peaks, Shara Lorea Clark mentions a Saturday Night Live sketch, two dream sequences from different episodes of The Simpsons, and Sesame Street’s ‘Monsterpiece Theater: Twin Beaks’ as some of the first TV references to a show that ‘saturated the cultural consciousness’ (2013: 9). It might be expected that Twin Peaks, described by Robert J. Thompson as the series that ‘changed the face of television’ (1997: 152), would attract this kind of attention during its run, but a more lasting influence is apparent in homages and parodies that continue to be produced. From Japanese video game Deadly Premonition, released in 2010, to Disney’s animated Gravity Falls (2012-), described by its creator Alex Hirsch as ‘my weird Twin Peaks meets The Simpsons series’ (interview, 2012), the influence of Twin Peaks is still strongly felt. As well as providing evidence of the show’s lasting influence, Twin Peaks parodies, homages and mash-ups extend the show’s own tendency to pastiche and repurpose familiar genres, stock characters and aesthetic styles. Such references are a fascinating source for analysing exactly what it is about the show that makes it so resonant. Sketches and segments pick up on a surprising range of elements from their source material. While many ‘do’ the famous dream sequence in the Red Room (like Scooby Doo? Mystery Incorporated’s ‘Nightmare in Red’), others highlight different aspects of the striking visuals, emphasise the use of sound, or foreground performance styles. The tone of such references can also be revealing about responses to the show: Homer Simpson’s, ‘Brilliant! I have absolutely no idea what’s going on,’ (‘Lisa’s Sax’) is designed to combine both the potentially ‘brilliant’ aspects of the series, with the deliberate obscurity that can be read more negatively. This chapter examines the spectrum from affectionate homage to outright parody that is apparent in a wealth of references from brief mentions to more sustained treatments, analysing how Twin Peaks appears, to very different effect, in material as varied as the light comedy drama of Psych’s ‘Dual Spires’ episode, (2010), the You Tube lego short ‘Twin Bricks’ (2007), or the Silent Singer from season two of the UK’s Psychoville (2012).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReturn to Twin Peaks: New Approaches to Materiality, Theory, and Genre on Television
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan Ltd.
Pages211-227
Number of pages16
ISBN (Print)9781137563842
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Nightmares
Parody
Homage
Pastiche
Aesthetics
Sound
Creator
Stock Character
Night
Obscurity
Gravity
Brick
Consciousness
Drama
Lego
Mystery
Performance Style
YouTube
Street Theatre
Wealth

Keywords

  • Twin Peaks
  • parody
  • mash up
  • homage
  • intertextuality
  • television drama
  • user-generated content

Cite this

Jowett, L., Weinstock, J. (Ed.), & Spooner, C. (Ed.) (2015). Nightmare in red: Twin Peaks parody, homage and mashup. In Return to Twin Peaks: New Approaches to Materiality, Theory, and Genre on Television (pp. 211-227). New York: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd..
Jowett, Lorna ; Weinstock, Jeffrey (Editor) ; Spooner, Catherine (Editor). / Nightmare in red: Twin Peaks parody, homage and mashup. Return to Twin Peaks: New Approaches to Materiality, Theory, and Genre on Television. New York : Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2015. pp. 211-227
@inbook{f1ff4ae6ecd24401a2620c4f4a925866,
title = "Nightmare in red: Twin Peaks parody, homage and mashup",
abstract = "In Fan Phenomena: Twin Peaks, Shara Lorea Clark mentions a Saturday Night Live sketch, two dream sequences from different episodes of The Simpsons, and Sesame Street’s ‘Monsterpiece Theater: Twin Beaks’ as some of the first TV references to a show that ‘saturated the cultural consciousness’ (2013: 9). It might be expected that Twin Peaks, described by Robert J. Thompson as the series that ‘changed the face of television’ (1997: 152), would attract this kind of attention during its run, but a more lasting influence is apparent in homages and parodies that continue to be produced. From Japanese video game Deadly Premonition, released in 2010, to Disney’s animated Gravity Falls (2012-), described by its creator Alex Hirsch as ‘my weird Twin Peaks meets The Simpsons series’ (interview, 2012), the influence of Twin Peaks is still strongly felt. As well as providing evidence of the show’s lasting influence, Twin Peaks parodies, homages and mash-ups extend the show’s own tendency to pastiche and repurpose familiar genres, stock characters and aesthetic styles. Such references are a fascinating source for analysing exactly what it is about the show that makes it so resonant. Sketches and segments pick up on a surprising range of elements from their source material. While many ‘do’ the famous dream sequence in the Red Room (like Scooby Doo? Mystery Incorporated’s ‘Nightmare in Red’), others highlight different aspects of the striking visuals, emphasise the use of sound, or foreground performance styles. The tone of such references can also be revealing about responses to the show: Homer Simpson’s, ‘Brilliant! I have absolutely no idea what’s going on,’ (‘Lisa’s Sax’) is designed to combine both the potentially ‘brilliant’ aspects of the series, with the deliberate obscurity that can be read more negatively. This chapter examines the spectrum from affectionate homage to outright parody that is apparent in a wealth of references from brief mentions to more sustained treatments, analysing how Twin Peaks appears, to very different effect, in material as varied as the light comedy drama of Psych’s ‘Dual Spires’ episode, (2010), the You Tube lego short ‘Twin Bricks’ (2007), or the Silent Singer from season two of the UK’s Psychoville (2012).",
keywords = "Twin Peaks, parody, mash up, homage, intertextuality, television drama, user-generated content",
author = "Lorna Jowett and Jeffrey Weinstock and Catherine Spooner",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781137563842",
pages = "211--227",
booktitle = "Return to Twin Peaks: New Approaches to Materiality, Theory, and Genre on Television",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Jowett, L, Weinstock, J (ed.) & Spooner, C (ed.) 2015, Nightmare in red: Twin Peaks parody, homage and mashup. in Return to Twin Peaks: New Approaches to Materiality, Theory, and Genre on Television. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., New York, pp. 211-227.

Nightmare in red: Twin Peaks parody, homage and mashup. / Jowett, Lorna; Weinstock, Jeffrey (Editor); Spooner, Catherine (Editor).

Return to Twin Peaks: New Approaches to Materiality, Theory, and Genre on Television. New York : Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2015. p. 211-227.

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapterResearch

TY - CHAP

T1 - Nightmare in red: Twin Peaks parody, homage and mashup

AU - Jowett, Lorna

A2 - Weinstock, Jeffrey

A2 - Spooner, Catherine

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - In Fan Phenomena: Twin Peaks, Shara Lorea Clark mentions a Saturday Night Live sketch, two dream sequences from different episodes of The Simpsons, and Sesame Street’s ‘Monsterpiece Theater: Twin Beaks’ as some of the first TV references to a show that ‘saturated the cultural consciousness’ (2013: 9). It might be expected that Twin Peaks, described by Robert J. Thompson as the series that ‘changed the face of television’ (1997: 152), would attract this kind of attention during its run, but a more lasting influence is apparent in homages and parodies that continue to be produced. From Japanese video game Deadly Premonition, released in 2010, to Disney’s animated Gravity Falls (2012-), described by its creator Alex Hirsch as ‘my weird Twin Peaks meets The Simpsons series’ (interview, 2012), the influence of Twin Peaks is still strongly felt. As well as providing evidence of the show’s lasting influence, Twin Peaks parodies, homages and mash-ups extend the show’s own tendency to pastiche and repurpose familiar genres, stock characters and aesthetic styles. Such references are a fascinating source for analysing exactly what it is about the show that makes it so resonant. Sketches and segments pick up on a surprising range of elements from their source material. While many ‘do’ the famous dream sequence in the Red Room (like Scooby Doo? Mystery Incorporated’s ‘Nightmare in Red’), others highlight different aspects of the striking visuals, emphasise the use of sound, or foreground performance styles. The tone of such references can also be revealing about responses to the show: Homer Simpson’s, ‘Brilliant! I have absolutely no idea what’s going on,’ (‘Lisa’s Sax’) is designed to combine both the potentially ‘brilliant’ aspects of the series, with the deliberate obscurity that can be read more negatively. This chapter examines the spectrum from affectionate homage to outright parody that is apparent in a wealth of references from brief mentions to more sustained treatments, analysing how Twin Peaks appears, to very different effect, in material as varied as the light comedy drama of Psych’s ‘Dual Spires’ episode, (2010), the You Tube lego short ‘Twin Bricks’ (2007), or the Silent Singer from season two of the UK’s Psychoville (2012).

AB - In Fan Phenomena: Twin Peaks, Shara Lorea Clark mentions a Saturday Night Live sketch, two dream sequences from different episodes of The Simpsons, and Sesame Street’s ‘Monsterpiece Theater: Twin Beaks’ as some of the first TV references to a show that ‘saturated the cultural consciousness’ (2013: 9). It might be expected that Twin Peaks, described by Robert J. Thompson as the series that ‘changed the face of television’ (1997: 152), would attract this kind of attention during its run, but a more lasting influence is apparent in homages and parodies that continue to be produced. From Japanese video game Deadly Premonition, released in 2010, to Disney’s animated Gravity Falls (2012-), described by its creator Alex Hirsch as ‘my weird Twin Peaks meets The Simpsons series’ (interview, 2012), the influence of Twin Peaks is still strongly felt. As well as providing evidence of the show’s lasting influence, Twin Peaks parodies, homages and mash-ups extend the show’s own tendency to pastiche and repurpose familiar genres, stock characters and aesthetic styles. Such references are a fascinating source for analysing exactly what it is about the show that makes it so resonant. Sketches and segments pick up on a surprising range of elements from their source material. While many ‘do’ the famous dream sequence in the Red Room (like Scooby Doo? Mystery Incorporated’s ‘Nightmare in Red’), others highlight different aspects of the striking visuals, emphasise the use of sound, or foreground performance styles. The tone of such references can also be revealing about responses to the show: Homer Simpson’s, ‘Brilliant! I have absolutely no idea what’s going on,’ (‘Lisa’s Sax’) is designed to combine both the potentially ‘brilliant’ aspects of the series, with the deliberate obscurity that can be read more negatively. This chapter examines the spectrum from affectionate homage to outright parody that is apparent in a wealth of references from brief mentions to more sustained treatments, analysing how Twin Peaks appears, to very different effect, in material as varied as the light comedy drama of Psych’s ‘Dual Spires’ episode, (2010), the You Tube lego short ‘Twin Bricks’ (2007), or the Silent Singer from season two of the UK’s Psychoville (2012).

KW - Twin Peaks

KW - parody

KW - mash up

KW - homage

KW - intertextuality

KW - television drama

KW - user-generated content

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781137563842

SP - 211

EP - 227

BT - Return to Twin Peaks: New Approaches to Materiality, Theory, and Genre on Television

PB - Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.

CY - New York

ER -

Jowett L, Weinstock J, (ed.), Spooner C, (ed.). Nightmare in red: Twin Peaks parody, homage and mashup. In Return to Twin Peaks: New Approaches to Materiality, Theory, and Genre on Television. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. 2015. p. 211-227