Perception of the ethical acceptability of live prey feeding to aquatic species kept in captivity.

Lucy Marshall*, Wanda McCormick, Gavan Cooke

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticle

Abstract

Previous research into public perceptions of live prey feeding has been focused on terrestrial animals. The reasons for this likely relate to the difficulty humans have in being compassionate to animals who are phylogenetically distantly related. In order to test these assumptions, the general public (two groups; one who had just visited an aquarium; and one group who had just visited a zoo), aquarium professionals in the UK/US and terrestrial zoo animal professionals (UK) were investigated to see how they would differ in their responses when asked about feeding various live aquatic animals to one another. Likert based surveys were used to obtain data face to face and via online social media. Demographics in previous research identified a lower acceptance of live prey feeding by females, however in aquatic animals this was not reflected. Instead, separations in perception were seen to exist between participants dependent on whether they had just visited a zoo or aquarium, or worked with animals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Animals
aquariums
animals
zoos
Zoo Animals
public research
Social Media
zoo animals
social networks
Research
demographic statistics
Demography
testing

Keywords

  • Zoo
  • Aquarium
  • Enrichment
  • Live feeding
  • Welfare
  • Public perception

Cite this

@article{d07855f2b7ac4aeea2e55beee7971ac2,
title = "Perception of the ethical acceptability of live prey feeding to aquatic species kept in captivity.",
abstract = "Previous research into public perceptions of live prey feeding has been focused on terrestrial animals. The reasons for this likely relate to the difficulty humans have in being compassionate to animals who are phylogenetically distantly related. In order to test these assumptions, the general public (two groups; one who had just visited an aquarium; and one group who had just visited a zoo), aquarium professionals in the UK/US and terrestrial zoo animal professionals (UK) were investigated to see how they would differ in their responses when asked about feeding various live aquatic animals to one another. Likert based surveys were used to obtain data face to face and via online social media. Demographics in previous research identified a lower acceptance of live prey feeding by females, however in aquatic animals this was not reflected. Instead, separations in perception were seen to exist between participants dependent on whether they had just visited a zoo or aquarium, or worked with animals.",
keywords = "Zoo, Aquarium, Enrichment, Live feeding, Welfare, Public perception",
author = "Lucy Marshall and Wanda McCormick and Gavan Cooke",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0216777",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "8",

}

Perception of the ethical acceptability of live prey feeding to aquatic species kept in captivity. / Marshall, Lucy; McCormick, Wanda; Cooke, Gavan.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 8, 22.08.2019, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perception of the ethical acceptability of live prey feeding to aquatic species kept in captivity.

AU - Marshall, Lucy

AU - McCormick, Wanda

AU - Cooke, Gavan

PY - 2019/8/22

Y1 - 2019/8/22

N2 - Previous research into public perceptions of live prey feeding has been focused on terrestrial animals. The reasons for this likely relate to the difficulty humans have in being compassionate to animals who are phylogenetically distantly related. In order to test these assumptions, the general public (two groups; one who had just visited an aquarium; and one group who had just visited a zoo), aquarium professionals in the UK/US and terrestrial zoo animal professionals (UK) were investigated to see how they would differ in their responses when asked about feeding various live aquatic animals to one another. Likert based surveys were used to obtain data face to face and via online social media. Demographics in previous research identified a lower acceptance of live prey feeding by females, however in aquatic animals this was not reflected. Instead, separations in perception were seen to exist between participants dependent on whether they had just visited a zoo or aquarium, or worked with animals.

AB - Previous research into public perceptions of live prey feeding has been focused on terrestrial animals. The reasons for this likely relate to the difficulty humans have in being compassionate to animals who are phylogenetically distantly related. In order to test these assumptions, the general public (two groups; one who had just visited an aquarium; and one group who had just visited a zoo), aquarium professionals in the UK/US and terrestrial zoo animal professionals (UK) were investigated to see how they would differ in their responses when asked about feeding various live aquatic animals to one another. Likert based surveys were used to obtain data face to face and via online social media. Demographics in previous research identified a lower acceptance of live prey feeding by females, however in aquatic animals this was not reflected. Instead, separations in perception were seen to exist between participants dependent on whether they had just visited a zoo or aquarium, or worked with animals.

KW - Zoo

KW - Aquarium

KW - Enrichment

KW - Live feeding

KW - Welfare

KW - Public perception

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/perception-ethical-acceptability-live-prey-feeding-aquatic-species-kept-captivity

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0216777

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0216777

M3 - Article

C2 - 31437256

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 8

ER -