We present a comparison of two ways of developing and delivering MOOCs. One was developed by the Open University in collaboration with FutureLearn; the other was developed independently by a small team at Northampton University. The different approaches had very different profiles of pedagogic flexibility, cost, development processes, institutional support, and participant numbers. This comparison shows that, even several years after MOOCs came to prominence, there is a range of viable approaches for MOOCs. MOOCs on existing large platforms can reach many thousands of people, but constrain pedagogical choice. Smaller, self-made MOOCs have smaller audiences but can target them more effectively.
|Title of host publication||Online Learning for Stem Subjects: International Examples of Technologies and Pedagogies in Use|
|Place of Publication||London|
|Number of pages||180|
|Publication status||Published - 16 Jan 2017|
Smith, N., Caldwell, H., Richards, M., Childs, M. (Ed.), & Soetanto, R. (Ed.) (2017). A comparison of MOOC development and delivery approaches. In Online Learning for Stem Subjects: International Examples of Technologies and Pedagogies in Use (pp. 101-112). Routledge.